These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

138 related items for PubMed ID: 10616123

  • 1. Influence of different types of surface electrodes on amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential.
    Jonas D, Bischoff C, Conrad B.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2171-5. PubMed ID: 10616123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Relationship between the size of the recording electrodes and morphology of the compound muscle action potentials.
    Wee AS, Ashley RA.
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 Dec; 30(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 2351092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Compound motor action potential interexaminer variability in photoguided placement of the recording electrodes.
    Axelson HW.
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Jun; 29(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 22659720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Contribution of reference electrode to the compound muscle action potential.
    Nandedkar SD, Barkhaus PE.
    Muscle Nerve; 2007 Jul; 36(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 17455266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Surface compound action potentials recorded from different locations on the anterior tibial muscle.
    Wee AS.
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 42(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 11938594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The influence of the reference electrode on CMAP configuration: leg nerve observations and an alternative reference site.
    Brashear A, Kincaid JC.
    Muscle Nerve; 1996 Jan; 19(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8538671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. CMAP variability as a function of electrode site and size.
    van Dijk JG, Tjon-a-Tsien A, van der Kamp W.
    Muscle Nerve; 1995 Jan; 18(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 7800000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Influence of the surface EMG electrode on the compound muscle action potential.
    Barkhaus PE, Periquet MI, Nandedkar SD.
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 46(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 16929630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of surface electrode recording area on compound muscle action potential scan processing for motor unit number estimation.
    Zhang D, Lu Z, Gong W, Zhou P.
    Front Neurosci; 2024 Jan; 18():1382871. PubMed ID: 38841095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A novel technique for recording from the serratus anterior.
    Depalma MJ, Pease WS, Johnson EW, Kadyan V.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Jan; 86(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 15640983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fibular motor nerve conduction studies: Investigating the mechanism for compound muscle action potential amplitude drop with proximal stimulation.
    Kamel JT, Knight-Sadler RJ, Roberts LJ.
    Muscle Nerve; 2015 Dec; 52(6):993-6. PubMed ID: 25846267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.