These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
87 related items for PubMed ID: 10627977
1. [Minimally invasive coronary bypass: optimal performance after a learning period]. Tevaearai HT, Mueller XM, von Segesser LK, Vogt P, Delabays A, Stumpe F. Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1999 Dec 04; 129(48):1884-8. PubMed ID: 10627977 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Midterm results of beating heart surgery in 1-vessel disease: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus off-pump coronary artery bypass with full sternotomy. Vicol C, Nollert G, Mair H, Samuel V, Lim C, Tiftikidis M, Eifert S, Reichart B. Heart Surg Forum; 2003 Dec 04; 6(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 15011666 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB): two techniques for beating heart surgery. Detter C, Reichenspurner H, Boehm DH, Thalhammer M, Raptis P, Schütz A, Reichart B. Heart Surg Forum; 2002 Dec 04; 5(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 12114131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Immediate extubation in the operating room after cardiac operations with thoracotomy and sternotomy. Lin TY, Chiu KM, Lu CW, Jean WH, Wang MJ, Chu SH. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2007 Mar 04; 45(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17424752 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive coronary revascularization in women: A safe approach for a high-risk group. Petro KR, Dullum MK, Garcia JM, Pfister AJ, Qazi AG, Boyce SW, Bafi AS, Stamou SC, Corso PJ. Heart Surg Forum; 2000 Mar 04; 3(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11064546 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of post-operative pain, stress response, and quality of life in port access vs. standard sternotomy coronary bypass patients. Grossi EA, Zakow PK, Ribakove G, Kallenbach K, Ursomanno P, Gradek CE, Baumann FG, Colvin SB, Galloway AC. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov 04; 16 Suppl 2():S39-42. PubMed ID: 10613554 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Efficacy of epidural analgesia in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery]. Wakasugi M, Shakunaga K, Fujimura J, Jomura K, Masuda A, Ito Y. Masui; 1998 Oct 04; 47(10):1207-11. PubMed ID: 9834592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive versus standard approach for excision of atrial masses. Russo MJ, Martens TP, Hong KN, Colman DL, Voleti VB, Smith CR, Argenziano M. Heart Surg Forum; 2007 Oct 04; 10(1):E50-4. PubMed ID: 17162403 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The subclavian and axillary arteries as inflow vessels for coronary artery bypass grafts--combined experience from three cardiac surgery centers. Bonatti J, Coulson AS, Bakhshay SA, Posch L, Sloan TJ. Heart Surg Forum; 2000 Oct 04; 3(4):307-11; discussion 311-2. PubMed ID: 11178292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ministernotomy versus complete sternotomy for coronary bypass operations: no difference in postoperative pulmonary function. Bauer M, Pasic M, Ewert R, Hetzer R. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr 04; 121(4):702-7. PubMed ID: 11279411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Minimally invasive coronary bypass: experience at the Erasme Hospital in 1997-1998]. De Cannière D. Rev Med Brux; 1998 Sep 04; 19(4):A215-20. PubMed ID: 9805947 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeat surgery for coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of the left thoracotomy approach. Harris DG, Coetzee AR, Augustyn JT, Saaiman A. Heart Surg Forum; 2009 Jun 04; 12(3):E163-7. PubMed ID: 19546070 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. High-risk patients with multivessel disease--is there a role for incomplete myocardial revascularization via minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting? Jacobs S, Holzhey D, Falk V, Garbade J, Walther T, Mohr FW. Heart Surg Forum; 2007 Jun 04; 10(6):E459-62. PubMed ID: 18187378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Use of minimally invasive direct coronary bypass (MIDCAB) in reoperative coronary surgery]. Filipiak K, Listewnik MJ, Brykczyński M, Sielicki P, Mokrzycki K, Płońska E. Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2003 Feb 04; 14(80):118-20. PubMed ID: 12728669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic minimally invasive mitral valve reconstruction yields less blood product transfusion and shorter length of stay. Woo YJ, Nacke EA. Surgery; 2006 Aug 04; 140(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 16904978 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement. Detter C, Deuse T, Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Reichart B. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Dec 04; 50(6):337-41. PubMed ID: 12457309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic assisted multivessel minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with port-access stabilization and cardiac positioning: paving the way for outpatient coronary surgery? Subramanian VA, Patel NU, Patel NC, Loulmet DF. Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 May 04; 79(5):1590-6; discussion 1590-6. PubMed ID: 15854938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Coronary surgery of the beating heart. First year of experience in a series of 317 non-selected coronary patients]. Saal JP, Le Houerou D, Ghorayeb G, Benkelfat C, Cloix C, Jessen P, Palsky E, Pouillart F, Guilmet D, Romano M. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2001 Jun 04; 94(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 11480154 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Experience in using three different minimally invasive approaches in cardiac operations. Wang WL, Cai KC, Zeng WS, Jiang RC. Med Sci Monit; 2003 Mar 04; 9(3):CR109-13. PubMed ID: 12640338 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]