These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


126 related items for PubMed ID: 10643026

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Anatomy of the jaw revisited with a dental CT software program.
    Abrahams JJ.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1993; 14(4):979-90. PubMed ID: 8352174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Must radiation dose for CT of the maxilla and mandible be higher than that for conventional panoramic radiography?
    Diederichs CG, Engelke WG, Richter B, Hermann KP, Oestmann JW.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Oct; 17(9):1758-60. PubMed ID: 8896633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Implant radiography.
    Friedland B.
    J Mass Dent Soc; 2003 Oct; 51(4):14-7. PubMed ID: 12677638
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
    Lecomber AR, Yoneyama Y, Lovelock DJ, Hosoi T, Adams AM.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria.
    Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Buser D.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001 Sep; 16(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 11280366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Use of spiral computed tomography for multiplanar dental reconstruction.
    Preda L, Di Maggio EM, Dore R, La Fianza A, Solcia M, Schifino MR, Campani R, Preda EG.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Nov; 26(6):327-31. PubMed ID: 9482007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. E.A.O. guidelines fo the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin.
    Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, Grondahl K, Haris D, Jacobs R, Lekholm U, Nakielny R, van Steenberghe D, van der Stelt P, European Association for Osseointegration.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Oct; 13(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 12674118
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Current state and future perspectives of panoramic radiography].
    Buchet R, Ramella G.
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1972 Jan; 53(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 5038476
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques.
    Kassebaum DK, Stoller NE, McDavid WD, Goshorn B, Ahrens CR.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 1574314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In vivo, thyroid and lens surface exposure with spiral and conventional computed tomography in dental implant radiography.
    Bianchi J, Goggins W, Rudolph M.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Aug; 90(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 10936846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.