These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

142 related items for PubMed ID: 10645391

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Quantification of heterophoria and phoria adaptation using an automated objective system compared to clinical methods.
    Han SJ, Guo Y, Granger-Donetti B, Vicci VR, Alvarez TL.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jan; 30(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 19682268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Comparison between dissociated and associated heterophoria].
    Kromeier M, Schmitt C, Bach M, Kommerell G.
    Ophthalmologe; 2002 Jul; 99(7):549-54. PubMed ID: 12148302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Interexaminer repeatability of a new, modified prentice card compared with established phoria tests.
    Wong EP, Fricke TR, Dinardo C.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 79(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 12086303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of near heterophoria tests under varying conditions on an adult sample.
    Lam AK, Lam A, Charm J, Wong KM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Mar; 25(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 15713208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Do prism corrections according to H.-J. Haase affect ocular prevalence?].
    Schroth V, Jaschinski W.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Jan; 224(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 17260317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Measuring the heterophoria: Agreement between two methods in non-presbyopic and presbyopic patients.
    Cantó-Cerdán M, Cacho-Martínez P, García-Muñoz Á.
    J Optom; 2018 Jan; 11(3):153-159. PubMed ID: 29198488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. How good is the estimated cover test at predicting the von Graefe phoria measurement?
    Calvin H, Rupnow P, Grosvenor T.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Nov; 73(11):701-6. PubMed ID: 8950752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Inter-examiner repeatability of heterophoria tests.
    Rainey BB, Schroeder TL, Goss DA, Grosvenor TP.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Oct; 75(10):719-26. PubMed ID: 9798211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
    Pickwell LD, Gilchrist JM, Hesler J.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988 Oct; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3419825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Near heterophoria with a description of the heterometer].
    Littan KE.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 May; 192(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 3404960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Phoria measurements using chromatic targets.
    Strong G, Pace R.
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Jun; 59(6):532-4. PubMed ID: 7102815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Characteristics and variability of vertical phoria adaptation in normal adults.
    Kono R, Hasebe S, Ohtsuki H, Furuse T, Tanaka T.
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 42(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 9822963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?
    Parmar KR, Dickinson C, Evans BJW.
    J Optom; 2019 Jun; 12(4):222-231. PubMed ID: 31501055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.