These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

219 related items for PubMed ID: 10649181

  • 1. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: early neonatal outcomes associated with normal rate, fetal stress, and fetal distress.
    Dellinger EH, Boehm FH, Crane MM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 182(1 Pt 1):214-20. PubMed ID: 10649181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fetal pulse oximetry and wavelet analysis of the fetal heart rate in the evaluation of abnormal cardiotocography tracings.
    Salamalekis E, Siristatidis C, Vasios G, Saloum J, Giannaris D, Chrelias C, Prentza A, Koutsouris D.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Apr; 32(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 16594915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Acidemia in neonates with a 5-minute Apgar score of 7 or greater - What are the outcomes?
    Sabol BA, Caughey AB.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):486.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27255470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intermittent versus continuous electronic monitoring in labour: a randomised study.
    Herbst A, Ingemarsson I.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Aug; 101(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 7947499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biophysical and biochemical markers at 30-34 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
    Valiño N, Giunta G, Gallo DM, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 47(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 26094952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM, Antsaklis A, Varvarigos I, Papas C, Sofatzis I, Montgomery JT.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effectiveness of pulse oximetry versus fetal electrocardiography for the intrapartum evaluation of nonreassuring fetal heart rate.
    Valverde M, Puertas AM, Lopez-Gallego MF, Carrillo MP, Aguilar MT, Montoya F.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 21978943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Mode of delivery has an independent impact on neonatal condition at birth.
    Prior T, Kumar S.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Oct; 181():135-9. PubMed ID: 25150951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Application of fuzzy inference systems for classification of fetal heart rate tracings in relation to neonatal outcome.
    Czabański R, Jezewski J, Wróbel J, Sikora J, Jezewski M.
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 23488308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biophysical and biochemical markers at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
    Valiño N, Giunta G, Gallo DM, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 47(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 26224608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical usefulness of pulse oximetry in the fetus with non-reassuring heart rate pattern?
    Schmidt S, Koslowski S, Sierra F, Meyer-Wittkopf M, Heller G.
    J Perinat Med; 2000 Feb; 28(4):298-305. PubMed ID: 11031700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Short-term neonatal outcome in diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies complicated by non-reassuring foetal heart rate tracings.
    Reif P, Panzitt T, Moser F, Resch B, Haas J, Lang U.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Oct; 26(15):1500-5. PubMed ID: 23528106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Newborn outcomes in british columbia after caesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status.
    Jenniskens K, Janssen PA.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Mar; 37(3):207-213. PubMed ID: 26001867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M, Shelton J, Fleming E.
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fetal recoil during labor to evaluate fetal well-being when heart rate monitoring is not informative.
    Elliott JP, Clewell WH, Hutson E.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 May; 89(5 Pt 2):800-2. PubMed ID: 9166325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Does centralized monitoring affect perinatal outcome?
    Weiss PM, Balducci J, Reed J, Klasko SK, Rust OA.
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1997 May; 6(6):317-9. PubMed ID: 9438212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fetal distress and the condition of newborn infants.
    Sykes GS, Molloy PM, Johnson P, Stirrat GM, Turnbull AC.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Oct 01; 287(6397):943-5. PubMed ID: 6412897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Association Between Intrapartum Cardiotocogram and Early Neonatal Outcomes in a Tertiary Hospital in Thailand.
    Amsumang S, Wuttikonsammakit P, Chamnan P.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2017 Apr 01; 100(4):365-73. PubMed ID: 29911805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Correlation of ominous fetal heart rate pattern and scalp blood pH with one-minute Apgar score.
    Ayromlooi J, Tobias M, Berg P.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1979 Apr 01; 17(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 41767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.