These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

552 related items for PubMed ID: 10650107

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
    Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne DH, Lee MJ.
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10650107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
    Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne H, Lee MJ.
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.
    Griffin N, Wastle ML, Dunn WK, Ryder SD, Beckingham IJ.
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2003 Jul; 15(7):809-13. PubMed ID: 12811312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease.
    Varghese JC, Farrell MA, Courtney G, Osborne H, Murray FE, Lee MJ.
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Aug; 54(8):513-20. PubMed ID: 10484218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
    Taylor AC, Little AF, Hennessy OF, Banting SW, Smith PJ, Desmond PV.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
    Basile L, Pezzoto C, Roubicek D, Tempra A, Laborda Molteni J.
    Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000 Jan; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
    Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Chey WD, Francis IR, Nandi PS.
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Comparative study of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in common duct stones].
    Miao L, Fan ZN, Ji GZ, Wen W, Wang X, Xiong GY, Jiang GB, Wang M, Liu Z, Wu P.
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Oct 01; 46(19):1465-7. PubMed ID: 19094622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
    Domagk D, Wessling J, Reimer P, Hertel L, Poremba C, Senninger N, Heinecke A, Domschke W, Menzel J.
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep 01; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for diagnosing stones in the common bile duct in patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiograms.
    Richard F, Boustany M, Britt LD.
    Am J Surg; 2013 Apr 01; 205(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 23518180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the exclusion of choledocholithiasis.
    Hjartarson JH, Hannesson P, Sverrisson I, Blöndal S, Ívarsson B, Björnsson ES.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct 01; 51(10):1249-56. PubMed ID: 27181286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.