These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

157 related items for PubMed ID: 10678419

  • 1. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing.
    Gill CO, Jones T.
    J Food Prot; 2000 Feb; 63(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 10678419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Microbiological sampling of meat cuts and manufacturing beef by excision or swabbing.
    Gill CO, Badoni M, McGinnis JC.
    J Food Prot; 2001 Mar; 64(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 11252475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Experimental comparison of excision and swabbing microbiological sampling methods for carcasses.
    Pepperell R, Reid CA, Solano SN, Hutchison ML, Walters LD, Johnston AM, Buncic S.
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2163-8. PubMed ID: 16245724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of the hygienic performances of the processes for cleaning, dressing and cooling pig carcasses at eight packing plants.
    Gill CO, Dussault F, Holley RA, Houde A, Jones T, Rheault N, Rosales A, Quessy S.
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2000 Jun 30; 58(1-2):65-72. PubMed ID: 10898463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Microbiological effects of a routine treatment for decontaminating hide-on carcasses at a large beef packing plant.
    Yang X, Badoni M, Tran F, Gill CO.
    J Food Prot; 2015 Feb 30; 78(2):256-63. PubMed ID: 25710139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of the hygienic performances of the processes for beef carcass dressing at 10 packing plants.
    Gill CO, Deslandes B, Rahn K, Houde A, Bryant J.
    J Appl Microbiol; 1998 Jun 30; 84(6):1050-8. PubMed ID: 9717290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Recovery of Escherichia coli Biotype I and Enterococcus spp. during refrigerated storage of beef carcasses inoculated with a fecal slurry.
    Calicioglu M, Buege DR, Ingham SC, Luchansky JB.
    J Food Prot; 1999 Aug 30; 62(8):944-7. PubMed ID: 10456751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Enhanced control of microbiological contamination of product at a large beef packing plant.
    Yang X, Badoni M, Youssef MK, Gill CO.
    J Food Prot; 2012 Jan 30; 75(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 22221368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing with three types of sponge or gauze.
    Martínez B, Celda MF, Anastasio B, García I, López-Mendoza MC.
    J Food Prot; 2010 Jan 30; 73(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20051208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Microbiological conditions of sheep carcasses from conventional or inverted dressing processes.
    Gill CO, Bryant J, Brereton DA.
    J Food Prot; 2000 Sep 30; 63(9):1291-4. PubMed ID: 10983809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. An evaluation of sampling methods for the detection of Escherichia coli and Salmonella on Turkey carcasses.
    McEvoy JM, Nde CW, Sherwood JS, Logue CM.
    J Food Prot; 2005 Jan 30; 68(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 15690801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Assessment of the hygienic performance of a sheep carcass dressing process.
    Gill CO, Baker LP.
    J Food Prot; 1998 Mar 30; 61(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 9708305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.