These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
63 related items for PubMed ID: 10684003
21. Streptococcal adhesion to novel low-shrink silorane-based restorative. Buergers R, Schneider-Brachert W, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 18768217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Analysis of the surface roughness and bacterium adhesions on the surface of restorative materials in vitro]. Zhao J, Zhang RX, Luo YX, Zheng YL. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Dec; 19(6):616-20. PubMed ID: 21431262 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material. Buergers R, Rosentritt M, Handel G. J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):461-9. PubMed ID: 18061740 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins. Sen D, Göller G, Işsever H. J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Adherence of Streptococcus sanguis. Jenkinson HF. N Z Dent J; 1986 Jul; 82(369):84-6. PubMed ID: 11547805 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Adhesive bonding of resin composite to various Ni-Cr alloy surfaces using different metal conditioners and a surface modification system. Almilhatti HJ, Giampaolo ET, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Pavarina AC, Betiol EA. J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):663-9. PubMed ID: 19523025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Early biofilm formation and the effects of antimicrobial agents on orthodontic bonding materials in a parallel plate flow chamber. Chin MY, Busscher HJ, Evans R, Noar J, Pratten J. Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16373451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The influence of 30-day-old Streptococcus mutans biofilm on the surface of esthetic restorative materials--an in vitro study. Fúcio SB, Carvalho FG, Sobrinho LC, Sinhoreti MA, Puppin-Rontani RM. J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):833-9. PubMed ID: 18621456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of different resin-based restorative materials on mutans streptococci adhesion. An in vitro study. Osorio E, Osorio R, Toledano M, Quevedo-Sarmiento J, Ruiz-Bravo A. Am J Dent; 2010 Oct; 23(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 21207795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Neme AL, Frazier KB, Roeder LB, Debner TL. Oper Dent; 2002 Oct; 27(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 11817469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Primary bacterial colonization of implant surfaces. Drake DR, Paul J, Keller JC. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999 Oct; 14(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 10212539 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Tooth colored dental restorative materials: porosities and surface topography in relation to bacterial adhesion. Skjørland KK, Hensten-Pettersen A, Orstavik D, Söderholm KJ. Acta Odontol Scand; 1982 Oct; 40(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 6954828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces. Bürgers R, Gerlach T, Hahnel S, Schwarz F, Handel G, Gosau M. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 19912269 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. S. sanguinis adhesion on rough titanium surfaces: effect of culture media. Rodríguez-Hernández AG, Muñoz-Tabares JA, Godoy-Gallardo M, Juárez A, Gil FJ. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 Mar 01; 33(2):714-20. PubMed ID: 25427478 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]