These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

195 related items for PubMed ID: 10688094

  • 1. Acucise endopyelotomy.
    Nakada SY.
    Urology; 2000 Feb; 55(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 10688094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Acucise endopyelotomy: evolution of a less-invasive technology.
    Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Clayman RV.
    J Endourol; 1996 Apr; 10(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8728678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Retrograde endopyelotomy: a comparison between laser and Acucise balloon cutting catheter.
    el-Nahas AR.
    Curr Urol Rep; 2007 Mar; 8(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 17303017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Ureteral access sheath facilitates inspection of incision of ureteropelvic junction.
    Auge BK, Wu NZ, Pietrow PK, Delvecchio FC, Preminger GM.
    J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):1070-3. PubMed ID: 12576848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A pediatric case of ureteropelvic junction obstruction treated with retrograde endopyelotomy.
    Umekawa T, Ishikawa Y, Kajikawa H, Iguchi M, Kurita T.
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1996 Nov; 42(11):895-8. PubMed ID: 8973943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty.
    Baldwin DD, Dunbar JA, Wells N, McDougall EM.
    J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12803987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.
    Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM, Schuessler WW, Moore RG.
    Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):791-5. PubMed ID: 7502417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Acucise endopyelotomy in a porcine model: procedure standardization and analysis of safety and immediate efficacy.
    Andreoni C, Srougi M, Ortiz V, Clayman RV.
    Int Braz J Urol; 2004 Dec; 30(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 15707519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Endopyelotomy review.
    Bernardo N, Smith AD.
    Arch Esp Urol; 1999 Jun; 52(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 10427896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Endopyelotomy: patient selection, results, and complications.
    Gerber GS, Lyon ES.
    Urology; 1994 Jan; 43(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 8284881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Endopyelotomy with ureteral cutting balloon device: long-term follow up of 13 patients].
    Umekawa T, Iguchi M, Amasaki N, Yamate T, Konya E, Kurita T.
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Aug; 90(8):713-7. PubMed ID: 10487047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Percutaneous endopyelotomy.
    Bernardo NO, Smith AD.
    Urology; 2000 Aug 01; 56(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 10925105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Acucise endopyelotomy: assessment of long-term durability.
    Nadler RB, Rao GS, Pearle MS, Nakada SY, Clayman RV.
    J Urol; 1996 Sep 01; 156(3):1094-7; discussion 1097-8. PubMed ID: 8709315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.