These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

340 related items for PubMed ID: 10699768

  • 1. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation.
    Deprez PH, Horsmans Y, Van Hassel M, Hoang P, Piessevaux H, Geubel A.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 10699768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy: a cost-minimization analysis.
    Bourguignon C, Destrumelle AS, Koch S, Grumblat A, Carayon P, Chopard C, Woronoff-Lemsi MC.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Aug; 58(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 12872090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective evaluation of costs.
    Kozarek RA, Raltz SL, Merriam LD, Sumida SE.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1996 Jan; 43(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 8903810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Performance and cost of disposable biopsy forceps in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison with reusable biopsy forceps.
    Lim CH, Choi MG, Kim WC, Kim JS, Cho YK, Park JM, Lee IS, Kim SW, Choi KY, Chung IS.
    Clin Endosc; 2012 Mar; 45(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 22741133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Advantages of disposable endoscopic accessories.
    Petersen BT.
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 10683219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S, Scherrer M, Rückauer KD, Daschner FD.
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis.
    Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Haller U.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 173(6):1812-5. PubMed ID: 8610767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
    DesCôteaux JG, Tye L, Poulin EC.
    Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
    Yimyam S, Srisuphan W, Plianpadung S, Senaratana W.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.