These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
450 related items for PubMed ID: 10701391
1. Automated external defibrillation: is survival only a shock away? Schwartz B, Verbeek PR. CMAJ; 2000 Feb 22; 162(4):533-4. PubMed ID: 10701391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Early defibrillation. Domanovits H, Sterz F, Janata K, Stühlinger G, Kürkciyan I, Laggner AN. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl; 1997 Feb 22; 111():306-8. PubMed ID: 9421056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A shock at home can save a life. For some people, it makes sense to have an automated external defibrillator at home. Harv Heart Lett; 2003 Jan 22; 13(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 12543613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated external defibrillators: to what extent does the algorithm delay CPR? Rea TD, Shah S, Kudenchuk PJ, Copass MK, Cobb LA. Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Aug 22; 46(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 16046942 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council 2000 for automatic external defibrillation. Position of the Basic Life Support and Automated External Defibrillation Working Group, following dismissal by the Executive Committee of the European Resuscitation Council]. Arntz HR, European Resuscitation Council. Z Kardiol; 2002 Sep 22; 91(9):673-6. PubMed ID: 12448065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimal interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a single shock as mandated by automated external defibrillations does not compromise outcomes in a porcine model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Ristagno G, Tang W, Russell JK, Jorgenson D, Wang H, Sun S, Weil MH. Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov 22; 36(11):3048-53. PubMed ID: 18824916 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Semi-automatic external defibrillation. Mols P, Clevenbergh P, Henry B, Decroly M, Langen C, Beaucarne E, Bruyninx J, Robert P, Labruyère JP, Flamand JP. Eur J Emerg Med; 1994 Dec 22; 1(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 9422170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Transthoracic incremental monophasic versus biphasic defibrillation by emergency responders (TIMBER): a randomized comparison of monophasic with biphasic waveform ascending energy defibrillation for the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. Kudenchuk PJ, Cobb LA, Copass MK, Olsufka M, Maynard C, Nichol G. Circulation; 2006 Nov 07; 114(19):2010-8. PubMed ID: 17060379 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The need for separate analyses of survival for "in-home" arrests versus "out-of-home" arrests in the determination of whether it is best to shock first or perform 3 min of CPR before the first defibrillation; in patients with ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest when the ambulance response time is greater than 5 min. Rottenberg EM. Resuscitation; 2009 Apr 07; 80(4):498-9. PubMed ID: 19185410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]