These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 10708227

  • 1. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies.
    Sharma AK, Goldberg I, Graham SL, Mohsin M.
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10708227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR.
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of the new perimetric GATE strategy with conventional full-threshold and SITA standard strategies.
    Schiefer U, Pascual JP, Edmunds B, Feudner E, Hoffmann EM, Johnson CA, Lagrèze WA, Pfeiffer N, Sample PA, Staubach F, Weleber RG, Vonthein R, Krapp E, Paetzold J.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jan; 50(1):488-94. PubMed ID: 19060285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms.
    Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of SITA: a new family of perimetric testing strategies.
    Shirato S, Inoue R, Fukushima K, Suzuki Y.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1999 Jan; 237(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 9951638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A New SITA Perimetric Threshold Testing Algorithm: Construction and a Multicenter Clinical Study.
    Heijl A, Patella VM, Chong LX, Iwase A, Leung CK, Tuulonen A, Lee GC, Callan T, Bengtsson B.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 198():154-165. PubMed ID: 30336129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.
    Capris P, Autuori S, Capris E, Papadia M.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 18(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18320509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.
    Bengtsson B, Heijl A.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Jun; 76(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 9686835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
    Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparing the full-threshold and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithms for short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Ng M, Racette L, Pascual JP, Liebmann JM, Girkin CA, Lovell SL, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 50(4):1726-33. PubMed ID: 19074800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Sensitivity of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm compared with standard full threshold algorithm in Humphrey visual field testing.
    Sekhar GC, Naduvilath TJ, Lakkai M, Jayakumar AJ, Pandi GT, Mandal AK, Honavar SG.
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Jul; 107(7):1303-8. PubMed ID: 10889102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reproducibility of visual field end point criteria for standard automated perimetry, full-threshold, and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm strategies: diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Bourne RR, Jahanbakhsh K, Boden C, Zangwill LM, Hoffmann EM, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 144(6):908-913. PubMed ID: 17919445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma.
    Lavanya R, Riyazuddin M, Dasari S, Puttaiah NK, Venugopal JP, Pradhan ZS, Devi S, Sreenivasaiah S, Ganeshrao SB, Rao HL.
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Sep; 29(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 32459685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies.
    Bengtsson B, Heijl A.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1999 Apr; 77(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 10321527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Glaucoma follow-up when converting from long to short perimetric threshold tests.
    Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Patella VM.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Apr; 118(4):489-93. PubMed ID: 10766134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of Humphrey MATRIX and Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard strategy in detecting early glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Prema R, George R, Hemamalini A, Sathyamangalam Ve R, Baskaran M, Vijaya L.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2009 Apr; 57(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 19384015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and full threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Aoki Y, Takahashi G, Kitahara K.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 17(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 17415692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster.
    Tan JCK, Agar A, Kalloniatis M, Phu J.
    Ophthalmology; 2024 Jun; 131(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 38110124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
    Szatmáry G, Biousse V, Newman NJ.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of false-negative responses for full threshold and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal observers.
    Johnson CA, Sherman K, Doyle C, Wall M.
    J Glaucoma; 2014 Sep; 23(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 23632399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.