These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


372 related items for PubMed ID: 10709044

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
    Gehrke P, Bleuel K, Fischer C, Sader R.
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun 14; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Impact of cement type and abutment height on pull-off force of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns on titanium implant stock abutments: an in vitro study.
    Müller L, Rauch A, Reissmann DR, Schierz O.
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Nov 19; 21(1):592. PubMed ID: 34798850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. In vitro comparisons of casting retention on implant abutments among commercially available and experimental castor oil-containing dental luting agents.
    Pinelli LA, Fais LM, Ricci WA, Reis JM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May 19; 109(5):319-24. PubMed ID: 23684282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study.
    Santosa RE, Martin W, Morton D.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 May 19; 25(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21197491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part II.
    Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Lilly KR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec 19; 68(6):885-90. PubMed ID: 1494113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. What is the Best Available Luting Agent for Implant Prosthesis?
    Almehmadi N, Kutkut A, Al-Sabbagh M.
    Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul 19; 63(3):531-545. PubMed ID: 31097143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
    Wadhwani C, Chung KH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul 19; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.