These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

219 related items for PubMed ID: 10726781

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Detection of diabetic retinopathy: a comparison between red-free digital images and colour transparencies.
    von Wendt G, Summanen P, Hallnäs K, Algvere P, Heikkilä K, Seregard S.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 243(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 15729542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Detection of retinal neovascularizations using 45 degrees and 60 degrees photographic fields with varying 45 degrees fields simulated on a 60 degrees photograph.
    von Wendt G, Heikkilä K, Summanen P.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Aug; 80(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 12190778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
    Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Detection of retinal lesions in diabetic retinopathy: comparative evaluation of 7-field digital color photography versus red-free photography.
    Venkatesh P, Sharma R, Vashist N, Vohra R, Garg S.
    Int Ophthalmol; 2015 Oct; 35(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 22961609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The diagnostic accuracy of single- and five-field fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy screening by primary care physicians.
    Srihatrai P, Hlowchitsieng T.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 66(1):94-97. PubMed ID: 29283131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
    Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Noble J, Aiello LM, Aiello LP.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Retinopathy screening in type 2 diabetes: reliability of wide angle fundus photography.
    de Sonnaville JJ, van der Feltz van der Sloot D, Ernst L, Wijkel D, Heine RJ.
    Diabet Med; 1996 May; 13(5):482-6. PubMed ID: 8737032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of low-light nonmydriatic digital imaging with 35-mm ETDRS seven-standard field stereo color fundus photographs and clinical examination.
    Silva PS, Walia S, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Dunn C, Bursell SE, Aiello LM, Aiello LP.
    Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):492-9. PubMed ID: 22827402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A telemedical approach to the screening of diabetic retinopathy: digital fundus photography.
    Liesenfeld B, Kohner E, Piehlmeier W, Kluthe S, Aldington S, Porta M, Bek T, Obermaier M, Mayer H, Mann G, Holle R, Hepp KD.
    Diabetes Care; 2000 Mar; 23(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 10868863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.