These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


156 related items for PubMed ID: 10733186

  • 21. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).
    Guevara N, Hoen M, Truy E, Gallego S.
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Cochleotopic selectivity of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array using the 2-deoxyglucose technique.
    Brown M, Shepherd RK, Webster WR, Martin RL, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1992 May; 59(2):224-40. PubMed ID: 1618713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic cochlear implant users.
    Truy E, Gallego S, Chanal JM, Collet L, Morgon A.
    Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):554-9. PubMed ID: 9546269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Measurements of threshold shifts observed when using normal and preformed electrodes.
    Reuter G, Cords SM, Issing P, Lenarz T.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S26. PubMed ID: 9391585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat. I. Absolute thresholds.
    Smith DW, Finley CC, van den Honert C, Olszyk VB, Konrad KE.
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 7737916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Clinical evaluation of the Clarion CII HiFocus 1 with and without positioner.
    van der Beek FB, Boermans PP, Verbist BM, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):577-92. PubMed ID: 16377994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Novel intracochlear electrode positioner: effects on electrode position.
    Yang NW, Hodges AV, Balkany TJ.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():18-20. PubMed ID: 11140988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. II: Comparison of Spiral Clarion and HiFocus II electrodes.
    Wardrop P, Whinney D, Rebscher SJ, Luxford W, Leake P.
    Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):68-79. PubMed ID: 15855031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Postoperative objective detecting techniques for cochlear implant children with inner ear malformation.
    Qiao XF, Li X, Zhang QW, Li TL, Wang D.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():1-6. PubMed ID: 29106852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
    Wilk M, Hessler R, Mugridge K, Jolly C, Fehr M, Lenarz T, Scheper V.
    PLoS One; 2016 Nov; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. EABR measurements during cochlear implantation in one-year-old, infant, child, adult, and elderly patients.
    Enomoto C, Minami S, Kaga K.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 141(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 33146057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.