These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

552 related items for PubMed ID: 10737489

  • 1. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database.
    Grossfeld GD, Chang JJ, Broering JM, Miller DP, Yu J, Flanders SC, Henning JM, Stier DM, Carroll PR.
    J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1171-7; quiz 1295. PubMed ID: 10737489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Martin SK, Amling CL, Zincke H.
    Urology; 1997 Nov; 50(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 9372884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.
    Kamat AM, Babaian K, Cheung MR, Naya Y, Huang SH, Kuban D, Babaian RJ.
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1860-3. PubMed ID: 14532793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Isolated local recurrence is rare after radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancer and positive surgical margins: therapeutic implications.
    Han M, Pound CR, Potter SR, Partin AW, Epstein JI, Walsh PC.
    J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):864-6. PubMed ID: 11176487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen.
    San Francisco IF, Regan MM, Olumi AF, DeWolf WC.
    J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G, Agamy MA, Alenda O, Allory Y, Mouracade P, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L.
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
    Shikanov S, Song J, Royce C, Al-Ahmadie H, Zorn K, Steinberg G, Zagaja G, Shalhav A, Eggener S.
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Predictors of secondary cancer treatment in patients receiving local therapy for prostate cancer: data from cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor.
    Grossfeld GD, Li YP, Lubeck DP, Broering JM, Mehta SS, Carroll PR.
    J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):530-5. PubMed ID: 12131303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler T, Maru N, Slawin K, Scardino PT.
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
    Freedland SJ, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Dorey F, Presti JC.
    Cancer; 2003 Dec 01; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Predicting risk of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy with the Center for Prostate Disease Research and Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor databases.
    Moul JW, Connelly RR, Lubeck DP, Bauer JJ, Sun L, Flanders SC, Grossfeld GD, Carroll PR.
    J Urol; 2001 Oct 01; 166(4):1322-7. PubMed ID: 11547066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Outcome of patients with Gleason score 8 or higher prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy alone.
    Mian BM, Troncoso P, Okihara K, Bhadkamkar V, Johnston D, Reyes AO, Babaian RJ.
    J Urol; 2002 Apr 01; 167(4):1675-80. PubMed ID: 11912386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS.
    J Urol; 2007 Dec 01; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.
    Kausik SJ, Blute ML, Sebo TJ, Leibovich BC, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak J, Zincke H.
    Cancer; 2002 Sep 15; 95(6):1215-9. PubMed ID: 12216087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.
    Vargas C, Kestin LL, Weed DW, Krauss D, Vicini FA, Martinez AA.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar 01; 61(3):714-24. PubMed ID: 15708249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
    Vis AN, Schröder FH, van der Kwast TH.
    Eur Urol; 2006 Aug 01; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.