These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
241 related items for PubMed ID: 10746125
21. Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. Martelli M, Majaj NJ, Pelli DG. J Vis; 2005 Feb 04; 5(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 15831067 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Learning to identify contrast-defined letters in peripheral vision. Chung ST, Levi DM, Li RW. Vision Res; 2006 Mar 04; 46(6-7):1038-47. PubMed ID: 16337252 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Spatial frequencies used in Landolt C orientation judgments: relation to inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways. McAnany JJ, Alexander KR. Vision Res; 2008 Nov 04; 48(26):2615-24. PubMed ID: 18374385 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Utilisation of spatial frequency information in face search. Ojanpää H, Näsänen R. Vision Res; 2003 Nov 04; 43(24):2505-15. PubMed ID: 13129538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding. Chung ST, Levi DM, Legge GE. Vision Res; 2001 Jun 04; 41(14):1833-50. PubMed ID: 11369047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in face versus letter-string perception. Tarkiainen A, Cornelissen PL, Salmelin R. Brain; 2002 May 04; 125(Pt 5):1125-36. PubMed ID: 11960901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing. Rousselet GA, Pernet CR, Bennett PJ, Sekuler AB. BMC Neurosci; 2008 Oct 03; 9():98. PubMed ID: 18834518 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Recognition thresholds for letters with simulated dioptric blur. Akutsu H, Bedell HE, Patel SS. Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Oct 03; 77(10):524-30. PubMed ID: 11100890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Spatial frequencies and the cerebral hemispheres: contrast sensitivity, visible persistence, and letter classification. Peterzell DH, Harvey LO, Hardyck CD. Percept Psychophys; 1989 Nov 03; 46(5):443-55. PubMed ID: 2813029 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Perceptual expertise with objects predicts another hallmark of face perception. McGugin RW, Gauthier I. J Vis; 2009 Apr 27; 10(4):15.1-12. PubMed ID: 20465319 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Identification of contrast-defined letters benefits from perceptual learning in adults with amblyopia. Chung ST, Li RW, Levi DM. Vision Res; 2006 Oct 27; 46(22):3853-61. PubMed ID: 16930666 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Do low spatial frequencies explain the extremely fast saccades towards human faces? Guyader N, Chauvin A, Boucart M, Peyrin C. Vision Res; 2017 Apr 27; 133():100-111. PubMed ID: 28202396 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification. Pelli DG, Levi DM, Chung ST. J Vis; 2004 Oct 29; 4(10):904-20. PubMed ID: 15595894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Aging effects on selective attention-related electroencephalographic patterns during face encoding. Deiber MP, Rodriguez C, Jaques D, Missonnier P, Emch J, Millet P, Gold G, Giannakopoulos P, Ibañez V. Neuroscience; 2010 Nov 24; 171(1):173-86. PubMed ID: 20801196 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Determinants of contrast sensitivity for the tumbling E and Landolt C. Alexander KR, McAnany JJ. Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Jan 24; 87(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 19996815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images. Näsänen R. Vision Res; 1999 Nov 24; 39(23):3824-33. PubMed ID: 10748918 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]