These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

191 related items for PubMed ID: 10755782

  • 41. [Obstetrical management of women with previous caesarean section].
    Poulain P, Seconda S.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Jan; 38(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 20034833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. True rupture of the caesarean section scar (a 15 year review, 1972-1987).
    Meehan FP, Magani IM.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1989 Feb; 30(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 2703100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Rates and Predictors of Caesarean Section for First and Second Births: A Prospective Cohort of Australian Women.
    Hure A, Powers J, Chojenta C, Loxton D.
    Matern Child Health J; 2017 May; 21(5):1175-1184. PubMed ID: 28102500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.
    Karlström A, Nystedt A, Johansson M, Hildingsson I.
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 20630634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Introducing caesarean section audit in a regional teaching hospital in The Netherlands.
    van Dillen J, Lim F, van Rijssel E.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 18313198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Delivery after a lower segment caesarean section.
    Lai SF, Sidek S.
    Singapore Med J; 1993 Feb; 34(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 8266134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Caesarean section audit by peer review.
    Wareham V, Bain C, Cruickshank D.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Jan; 48(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8449267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Caesarean section on maternal request: risks and benefits in healthy nulliparous women and their infants.
    Dahlgren LS, von Dadelszen P, Christilaw J, Janssen PA, Lisonkova S, Marquette GP, Liston RM.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Sep; 31(9):808-817. PubMed ID: 19941705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Vaginal birth after Caesarean versus elective repeat Caesarean for women with a single prior Caesarean birth: a systematic review of the literature.
    Dodd J, Crowther C.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Oct; 44(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 15387856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Information for women after CS: are they getting enough?
    Lucas A.
    RCM Midwives; 2004 Nov; 7(11):472-5. PubMed ID: 15612178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. [Vaginal breech delivery after 36 week of pregnancy in a selected group of pregnancy - analysis of perinatal results in years 2008-2011].
    Hruban L, Janků P, Ventruba P, Oškrdalová L, Skorkovská K, Hodická Z, Tápalová V, Mekiňová L, Smerek M.
    Ceska Gynekol; 2014 Nov; 79(5):343-9. PubMed ID: 25472451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.