These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
140 related items for PubMed ID: 10757436
1. Prenatal diagnosis of macrosomia in pregnancy complicated by diabetes mellitus. Landon MB. J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 10757436 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The fetus of a diabetic mother: sonographic evaluation. Nizard J, Ville Y. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Apr; 14(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 19167940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia: a comparison of weight prediction models using computer simulation. Mongelli M, Benzie R. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):500-3. PubMed ID: 16180258 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonic fetal weight estimation in women with pregnancy complicated by diabetes. Farrell T, Fraser R, Chan K. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Nov; 83(11):1065-6. PubMed ID: 15488123 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies and suspected fetal macrosomia. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M. J Perinat Med; 2004 Nov; 32(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 15085885 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia? Combs CA, Rosenn B, Miodovnik M, Siddiqi TA. J Matern Fetal Med; 2000 Nov; 9(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10757437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of sonographic estimation of fetal weight before induction of labor in diabetic pregnancies and pregnancies with suspected fetal macrosomia. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Mashiach R, Hod M, Meisner I. J Perinat Med; 2003 Nov; 31(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 12825478 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of ultrasound in the management of diabetes in pregnancy. Ahmed B, Abushama M, Khraisheh M, Dudenhausen J. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Nov; 28(15):1856-63. PubMed ID: 25367382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of ultrasonography in the management of diabetic pregnancy. Tamura RK, Dooley SL. Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 34(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 1934704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of a single fetal weight estimation at 29-34 weeks in diabetic pregnancies: can it predict large-for-gestational-age infants at term? Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, Hadar E, Hod M, Yogev Y. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 197(5):497.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17980186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation: Should Macrosomia-Specific Formulas Be Utilized? Porter B, Neely C, Szychowski J, Owen J. Am J Perinatol; 2015 Aug; 32(10):968-72. PubMed ID: 25730134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimators of birth weight in pregnant women requiring insulin: a comparison of seven sonographic models. McLaren RA, Puckett JL, Chauhan SP. Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):565-9. PubMed ID: 7898834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight in macrosomic fetuses: diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies. Wong SF, Chan FY, Cincotta RB, Oats JJ, McIntyre HD. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Nov; 41(4):429-32. PubMed ID: 11787919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound prediction of fetal macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Panunzi C, Cardinali F, Khalil A, Mustafa HJ, Spinillo A, Rizzo G, Flacco ME, Maruotti G, D'Antonio F. J Perinat Med; 2024 Jul 26; 52(6):623-632. PubMed ID: 38860644 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy. Rotmensch S, Celentano C, Liberati M, Malinger G, Sadan O, Bellati U, Glezerman M. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May 26; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of macrosomia by serial sonographic measurements of fetal soft-tissues and the liver in women with pregestational diabetes. Garabedian C, Vambergue A, Salleron J, Deruelle P. Diabetes Metab; 2013 Dec 26; 39(6):511-8. PubMed ID: 23643348 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus. Abramowicz JS, Robischon K, Cox C. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun 26; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of 36 different weight estimation formulae in fetuses with macrosomia. Hoopmann M, Abele H, Wagner N, Wallwiener D, Kagan KO. Fetal Diagn Ther; 2010 Jun 26; 27(4):204-13. PubMed ID: 20523027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of fetal macrosomia: effect of sonographic fetal weight-estimation model and threshold used. Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meizner I, Mashiach R, Pardo J, Ben-Haroush A. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul 26; 38(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21229567 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonographic diagnosis of the large for gestational age fetus at term: does it make a difference? Levine AB, Lockwood CJ, Brown B, Lapinski R, Berkowitz RL. Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jan 26; 79(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1727587 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]