These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

127 related items for PubMed ID: 10768410

  • 1. Optimum domestic processing and cooking methods for reducing the polyphenolic (antinutrient) content of pigeon peas.
    Duhan A, Khetarpaul N, Bishnoi S.
    Nutr Health; 2000; 13(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 10768410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of various domestic processing and cooking methods on phytic acid and HCl-extractability of calcium, phosphorus and iron of pigeon pea.
    Duhan A, Khetarpaul N, Bishnoi S.
    Nutr Health; 1999; 13(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 10561865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of domestic processing and cooking methods on phytic acid and polyphenol contents of pea cultivars (Pisum sativum).
    Bishnoi S, Khetarpaul N, Yadav RK.
    Plant Foods Hum Nutr; 1994 Jun; 45(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 7971780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Antinutrients and digestibility (in vitro) of soaked, dehulled and germinated cowpeas.
    Preet K, Punia D.
    Nutr Health; 2000 Jun; 14(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 10904935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Protein quality of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) as influenced by seed polyphenols and cooking process.
    Singh U.
    Plant Foods Hum Nutr; 1993 Mar; 43(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 8386359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Chemical composition and content of antinutritional factors in Polish cultivars of peas.
    Zdunczyk Z, Godycka I, Amarowicz R.
    Plant Foods Hum Nutr; 1997 Mar; 50(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 9198113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of soaking, germination, cooking and fermentation on antinutritional factors in cowpeas.
    Ibrahim SS, Habiba RA, Shatta AA, Embaby HE.
    Nahrung; 2002 Apr; 46(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 12017999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of domestic processing on zinc bioavailability from ricebean (Vigna umbellata) diets.
    Kaur M, Kawatra BL.
    Plant Foods Hum Nutr; 2002 Apr; 57(3-4):307-18. PubMed ID: 12602938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of domestic processing and cooking methods on total, hcl extractable iron and in vitro availability of iron in spinach and amaranth leaves.
    Yadav SK, Sehgal S.
    Nutr Health; 2002 Apr; 16(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 12102364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. In vitro digestibility, protein composition and techno-functional properties of Saskatchewan grown yellow field peas (Pisum sativum L.) as affected by processing.
    Ma Z, Boye JI, Hu X.
    Food Res Int; 2017 Feb; 92():64-78. PubMed ID: 28290299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Pea varieties resources in Russia in context to the situation in Western Europe.
    Gorpintchenko T, Anikanova Z.
    Nahrung; 2001 Oct; 45(6):371-3. PubMed ID: 11712232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.