These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

107 related items for PubMed ID: 10786167

  • 1. Influence of filler content and gap dimension on wear resistance of resin composite luting cements around a CAD/CAM ceramic inlay restoration.
    Torii Y, Itou K, Itota T, Hama K, Konishi N, Nagamine M, Inoue K.
    Dent Mater J; 1999 Dec; 18(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 10786167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear.
    Kawai K, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF.
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jan; 25(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 8190882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material.
    Guzman AF, Moore BK, Andres CJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997 Jan; 10(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9495160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations.
    Irie M, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Suzuki K, Watts DC.
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 20334906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Marginal adaptation, fracture load and macroscopic failure mode of adhesively luted PMMA-based CAD/CAM inlays.
    Ender A, Bienz S, Mörmann W, Mehl A, Attin T, Stawarczyk B.
    Dent Mater; 2016 Feb; 32(2):e22-9. PubMed ID: 26723841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S, Vandamme K, Lijnen I, Naert I.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010 Feb; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
    Zuellig-Singer R, Bryant RW.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Antagonist enamel wears more than ceramic inlays.
    Krämer N, Kunzelmann KH, Taschner M, Mehl A, Garcia-Godoy F, Frankenberger R.
    J Dent Res; 2006 Dec; 85(12):1097-100. PubMed ID: 17122161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years.
    Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
    J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):329-38. PubMed ID: 8530722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of gap dimension on wear resistance of luting agents.
    Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y.
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 8599594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Filler content and gap width after luting of ceramic inlays, using the ultrasonic insertion technique and composite resin cements. An in vitro study.
    Sjögren G, Hedlund SO.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Dec; 55(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 9477035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent.
    Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1998 Oct; 56(5):263-7. PubMed ID: 9860093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, Petschelt A.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Oct; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Marginal adaptation of four tooth-coloured inlay systems in vivo.
    Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Noack MJ, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Roulet JF, Vanherle G.
    J Dent; 1992 Feb; 20(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 1548381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV, Conrad R, Engelmeier RL, Gerngross P, Paravina R, Perezous L, Powers JM.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A, Hooshmand T, Asefzadeh F, Khalilinejad F, Alihemmati M, Van Noort R.
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G.
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A, Abdelaziz KM, Freitag S, Kern M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.