These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 10806941

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [A cephalometric appraisal of mandibular protrusion treated with occipito-mental anchorage].
    Kiyomura H.
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1970; 29(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 5283276
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements.
    Nalçaci R, Oztürk F, Sökücü O.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 20100922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ, Maal T, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Does the panoramic radiography have the power to identify the gonial angle in orthodontics?
    Okşayan R, Aktan AM, Sökücü O, Haştar E, Ciftci ME.
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012 Feb; 2012():219708. PubMed ID: 23365514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reliability and validity of the Digigraph 100 in orthodontic diagnosis.
    Doll GM, Zentner A, Krummenauer F, Gärtner H.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2001 Mar; 62(2):116-32. PubMed ID: 11304928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A, Diwakar NR, Jayanthi K, Hema HM, Deepukrishna S, Ghaste SR.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016 Mar; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of two methods of lateral skull radiography for cephalometric analysis.
    McKenna BI, Winzar CF, Kruger BJ.
    Aust Dent J; 1972 Oct; 17(5):340-2. PubMed ID: 4510769
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.