These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
390 related items for PubMed ID: 10811085
1. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of optical side effects. Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group. Hersh PS, Steinert RF, Brint SF. Ophthalmology; 2000 May; 107(5):925-33. PubMed ID: 10811085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. A randomized prospective study. Hersh PS, Brint SF, Maloney RK, Durrie DS, Gordon M, Michelson MA, Thompson VM, Berkeley RB, Schein OD, Steinert RF. Ophthalmology; 1998 Aug; 105(8):1512-22, discussion 1522-3. PubMed ID: 9709767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group. Steinert RF, Hersh PS. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1998 Aug; 96():197-221; discussion 221-7. PubMed ID: 10360290 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Results of phase III excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. The Summit PRK Study Group. Hersh PS, Stulting RD, Steinert RF, Waring GO, Thompson KP, O'Connell M, Doney K, Schein OD. Ophthalmology; 1997 Oct; 104(10):1535-53. PubMed ID: 9331190 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: a control-matched study. Pop M, Payette Y. Ophthalmology; 2000 Feb; 107(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 10690820 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized bilateral comparison of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for 2.50 to 8.00 diopters of myopia. El-Maghraby A, Salah T, Waring GO, Klyce S, Ibrahim O. Ophthalmology; 1999 Mar; 106(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 10080199 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications. Ghadhfan F, Al-Rajhi A, Wagoner MD. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2041-8. PubMed ID: 18053901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia of -6.00 diopters or less. Melbourne Excimer Laser Group. Tole DM, McCarty DJ, Couper T, Taylor HR. J Refract Surg; 2001 Dec; 17(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11201777 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of -6 D or less using the Nidek EC-5000 laser. Fernández AP, Jaramillo J, Jaramillo M. J Refract Surg; 2000 Dec; 16(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 11110311 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C versus LASIK in custom surgeries for myopia: a bilateral prospective randomized clinical trial. Wallau AD, Campos M. J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):326-36. PubMed ID: 18500080 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]