These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

166 related items for PubMed ID: 10819913

  • 21. Cranial MRI of small rodents using a clinical MR scanner.
    Linn J, Schwarz F, Schichor C, Wiesmann M.
    Methods; 2007 Sep; 43(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 17720558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. MRI monitoring of cartilage repair in the knee: a review.
    Domayer SE, Welsch GH, Dorotka R, Mamisch TC, Marlovits S, Szomolanyi P, Trattnig S.
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2008 Dec; 12(4):302-17. PubMed ID: 19016394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. In-office MR imaging.
    Shellock FG, Hollister MC.
    Clin Sports Med; 2002 Apr; 21(2):261-87, vii. PubMed ID: 12122839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope.
    Frauenrath T, Hezel F, Heinrichs U, Kozerke S, Utting JF, Kob M, Butenweg C, Boesiger P, Niendorf T.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T.
    Palosaari K, Ojala R, Blanco-Sequeiros R, Tervonen O.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. High- versus low-field MR imaging.
    Tavernier T, Cotten A.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 43(4):673-81, viii. PubMed ID: 15893530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. MR in the study of knee cartilage pathologies: influence of location and grade on the effectiveness of the method.
    Macarini L, Murrone M, Marini S, Mariano M, Zaccheo N, Moretti B.
    Radiol Med; 2003 Apr; 105(4):296-307. PubMed ID: 12835623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Value of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of prostate cancer.
    Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Heijmink SW.
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Dec; 19(6):285-9. PubMed ID: 19512850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. 3.0-T morphological and angiographic brain imaging: a 5-years experience.
    Scarabino T, Popolizio T, Giannatempo GM, Nemore F, Maiorana A, Carriero A, Messana D, Maggialetti A, Armillotta M, Salvolini U.
    Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 17310288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Orbital and ocular imaging using 3- and 1.5-T MR imaging systems.
    Mafee MF, Rapoport M, Karimi A, Ansari SA, Shah J.
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2005 Feb; 15(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15927858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Liver MR imaging: 1.5T versus 3T.
    Ramalho M, Altun E, Herédia V, Zapparoli M, Semelka R.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):321-47, vi. PubMed ID: 17893053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Current issues and perspectives in small rodent magnetic resonance imaging using clinical MRI scanners.
    Brockmann MA, Kemmling A, Groden C.
    Methods; 2007 Sep; 43(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 17720566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Pros and cons of low-field magnetic resonance imaging in veterinary practice.
    Konar M, Lang J.
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011 Sep; 52(1 Suppl 1):S5-S14. PubMed ID: 21392156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. MRI of peripheral joints with a low-field dedicated system: a reliable and cost-effective alternative to high-field units?
    Kersting-Sommerhoff B, Hof N, Lenz M, Gerhardt P.
    Eur Radiol; 1996 Sep; 6(4):561-5. PubMed ID: 8798043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) of the knee joint: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using standard and dynamic paramagnetic contrast media. Report of 52 cases surgically and histologically controlled.
    Barile A, Sabatini M, Iannessi F, Di Cesare E, Splendiani A, Calvisi V, Masciocchi C.
    Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):356-66. PubMed ID: 15103287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Experimental nerve imaging at 1.5-T.
    Nolte I, Pham M, Bendszus M.
    Methods; 2007 Sep; 43(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 17720560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [New possibilities and aspects of low-field magnetic resonance tomography].
    Grönemeyer DH, Kaufman L, Rothschild P, Seibel RM.
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1989 Sep; 30(4):519-27. PubMed ID: 2798840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Whole-body MR imaging. Practical issues, clinical applications, and future directions.
    Eustace SJ, Walker R, Blake M, Yucel EK.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1999 May; 7(2):209-36. PubMed ID: 10382158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. MR imaging of synovial disorders of the knee: an update.
    Frick MA, Wenger DE, Adkins M.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Nov; 45(6):1017-31, vii. PubMed ID: 17981181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.