These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

135 related items for PubMed ID: 10823079

  • 21. Intraoral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification: comparison with conventional radiography.
    Svanaes DB, Møystad A, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Gröndahl HG.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Jul; 82(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 8843461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Detection of non-cavitated approximal caries lesions in digital images from seven solid-state receptors with particular focus on task-specific enhancement filters. An ex vivo study in human teeth.
    Haiter-Neto F, dos Anjos Pontual A, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Sep; 12(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 18210170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effect of digital filtering on the measurement of the depth of proximal caries under different exposure conditions.
    Koob A, Sanden E, Hassfeld S, Staehle HJ, Eickholz P.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 15724747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Digital radiography and caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 9482015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Diagnostic performance of radiovisiography in combination with a diagnosis assisting program versus conventional radiography and radiovisiography in basic mode and with magnification.
    Forner Navarro L, Llena Puy MC, García Godoy F.
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2008 Apr 01; 13(4):E261-5. PubMed ID: 18379453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Observers' use of image enhancement in assessing caries in radiographs taken by four intra-oral digital systems.
    Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A, Gröndahl HG.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan 01; 25(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9084283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Does the addition of a lead foil to digital radiographic receptors influence image contrast and approximal caries lesions diagnosis?
    Fontenele RC, Nejaim Y, Farias Gomes A, Gaêta-Araujo H, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 May 01; 49(4):20190384. PubMed ID: 32027521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.