These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

411 related items for PubMed ID: 10845486

  • 1. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability.
    Völk M, Strotzer M, Lenhart M, Manke C, Nitz WR, Seitz J, Feuerbach S, Link J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1583-8. PubMed ID: 10845486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries.
    Korst MB, Joosten FB, Postma CT, Jager GJ, Krabbe JK, Barentsz JO.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Mar; 174(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 10701600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Renal MR angiography at 1.0 T: three-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast techniques versus gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast low-angle shot breath-hold imaging.
    Hahn U, Miller S, Nägele T, Schick F, Erdtmann B, Duda S, Claussen CD.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1501-8. PubMed ID: 10350280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography.
    Bakker J, Beek FJ, Beutler JJ, Hene RJ, de Kort GA, de Lange EE, Moons KG, Mali WP.
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 9577501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography.
    De Cobelli F, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, Mellone R, Angeli E, Venturini M, Garancini MP, Quartagno R, Bianchi G, Del Maschio A.
    Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 9393522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.
    De Cobelli F, Venturini M, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, Salvioni M, Angeli E, Scifo P, Garancini MP, Quartagno R, Bianchi G, Del Maschio A.
    Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):373-80. PubMed ID: 10671583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries.
    Holland GA, Dougherty L, Carpenter JP, Golden MA, Gilfeather M, Slossman F, Schnall MD, Axel L.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):971-81. PubMed ID: 8610584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries in humans: feasibility, contrast agent reduction, and accuracy for detection of stenoses.
    Zorger N, Jung EM, Hamer OW, Paetzel C, Schreyer A, Seitz J, Stehr A, Steinbauer M, Feuerbach S, Herold T.
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2008 Apr; 38(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18198411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.
    Thornton MJ, Thornton F, O'Callaghan J, Varghese JC, O'Brien E, Walshe J, Lee MJ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1279-83. PubMed ID: 10541105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US.
    Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Weber CH, Michaely HJ, Waggershauser T, Ittrich C, Dietrich O, Reiser MF.
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography.
    Wasser MN, Westenberg J, van der Hulst VP, van Baalen J, van Bockel JH, van Erkel AR, Pattynama PM.
    Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 9015052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: value of the combination of three-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography sequences.
    Loubeyre P, Trolliet P, Cahen R, Grozel F, Labeeuw M, Minh VA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Aug; 167(2):489-94. PubMed ID: 8686634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Renal arteries: optimization of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with bolus-timing-independent fast multiphase acquisition in a single breath hold.
    Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Knopp MV, Essig M, Laub G, Hawighorst H, Zuna I, Kallinowski F, van Kaick G.
    Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):667-79. PubMed ID: 10352590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA.
    Soulez G, Pasowicz M, Benea G, Grazioli L, Niedmann JP, Konopka M, Douek PC, Morana G, Schaefer FK, Vanzulli A, Bluemke DA, Maki JH, Prince MR, Schneider G, Ballarati C, Coulden R, Wasser MN, McCauley TR, Kirchin MA, Pirovano G.
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):273-85. PubMed ID: 18372471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Assessment of renal artery stenosis: comparison of captopril renography and gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography.
    Bongers V, Bakker J, Beutler JJ, Beek FJ, De Klerk JM.
    Clin Radiol; 2000 May; 55(5):346-53. PubMed ID: 10816399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of intraarterial and IV gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with digital subtraction angiography for the detection of renal artery stenosis in pigs.
    Omary RA, Henseler KP, Unal O, Maciolek LJ, Finn JP, Li D, Nemcek AA, Vogelzang RL, Grist TM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 11756103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.
    Rountas C, Vlychou M, Vassiou K, Liakopoulos V, Kapsalaki E, Koukoulis G, Fezoulidis IV, Stefanidis I.
    Ren Fail; 2007 Jan; 29(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17497443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in renal artery stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Law YM, Tay KH, Gan YU, Cheah FK, Tan BS.
    Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Apr; 14(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 18382021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Fain SB, King BF, Breen JF, Kruger DG, Riederer SJ.
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):481-90. PubMed ID: 11161166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    U-King-Im JM, Graves MJ, Cross JJ, Higgins NJ, Wat J, Trivedi RA, Tang T, Howarth SP, Kirkpatrick PJ, Antoun NM, Gillard JH.
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.