These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

96 related items for PubMed ID: 10850252

  • 1. Bonding amalgam to a resin-modified glass-ionomer base.
    Belcher MA, Kunsemiller JA.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):305-8. PubMed ID: 10850252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Dec; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of adhesive systems associated with resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Wang L, Sakai VT, Kawai ES, Buzalaf MA, Atta MT.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16457670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM, Sudeep PT, Bhat KS.
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999 Feb; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
    Chitnis D, Dunn WJ, Gonzales DA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Dentin treatment with an oxalate solution and glass ionomer bond strength.
    Haveman CW, Charlton DG.
    Am J Dent; 1994 Oct; 7(5):247-51. PubMed ID: 7986446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Surface treatment effects on amalgam repair strength.
    Diefenderfer KE, Reinhardt JW, Brown SB.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 9545913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of different bonding conditions on the shear bond strength of two compomers to bovine dentin.
    Al-Nahedh H, Ateyah NZ.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep 01; 7(4):9-16. PubMed ID: 16957786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of chlorhexidine application on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer.
    Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Stifanelli P, Scribante A, Klersy C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb 01; 129(2):273-6. PubMed ID: 16473721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK, Ulusoy C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb 01; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin.
    Shirai K, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Shintani H, Van Meerbeek B.
    Dent Mater; 2005 Feb 01; 21(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 15681009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of self-etching primer preapplication on the dentin-titanium shear bond strength mediated by a resin-modified glass-lonomer cement.
    Schittly E, Besnault C, Bouter D, Ruse ND, Degrange M, Attal JP.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005 Feb 01; 18(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 15889658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effectiveness of different adhesive primers on the bond strength between an indirect composite resin and a base metal alloy.
    Sarafianou A, Seimenis I, Papadopoulos T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May 01; 99(5):377-87. PubMed ID: 18456049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Shear peel bond strength of compomers veneered to amalgam.
    Al-Jazairy YH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr 01; 85(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 11319538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H, Zhang F, Wu Y, Chen C, Liu W.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec 01; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of time on the diametral tensile strength of resin-modified restorative glass ionomer cements and compomer.
    Cefaly DF, Valarelli FP, Seabra BG, Mondelli RF, Navarro MF.
    Braz Dent J; 2001 Dec 01; 12(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 11696919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of surface treatment on orthodontic bonding to amalgam.
    Skilton JW, Tyas MJ, Woods MG.
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May 01; 22(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 16792246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin.
    Cheylan JM, Gonthier S, Degrange M.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002 May 01; 15(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 12170851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Shear bond strength of resin modified glass ionomer cement bonded to different tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Taher NM, Ateyah NZ.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb 01; 8(2):25-34. PubMed ID: 17277824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Hardness of three resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials as a function of depth and time.
    Roberts HW, Berzins DW, Charlton DG.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009 Feb 01; 21(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 19689726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.