These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. When four principles are too many: bloodgate, integrity and an action-guiding model of ethical decision making in clinical practice. Muirhead W. J Med Ethics; 2012 Apr; 38(4):195-6. PubMed ID: 22074770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The priesthood of bioethics and the return of casuistry. Wildes KW. J Med Philos; 1993 Feb; 18(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 8433047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Solving the doctor's dilemma? Elliott C. New Sci; 1992 Jan 11; 133(1803):42-4. PubMed ID: 11656143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Four approaches to doing ethics. Levi BH. J Med Philos; 1996 Feb 11; 21(1):7-39. PubMed ID: 8740882 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. What is the outcome of applying principlism? Hine K. Theor Med Bioeth; 2011 Dec 11; 32(6):375-88. PubMed ID: 21710224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The method of public morality versus the method of principlism. Green RM, Gert B, Clouser KD. J Med Philos; 1993 Oct 11; 18(5):477-89. PubMed ID: 8138741 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Bioethics: secular philosophy, Jewish law and modern medicine. Steinberg A. Isr J Med Sci; 1989 Jul 11; 25(7):404-9. PubMed ID: 2759838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Decision making methodology in bioethics: an introduction. Erde EL. Theor Med; 1991 Dec 11; 12(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 1801298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them? McCarthy J. Med Humanit; 2003 Dec 11; 29(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 15884187 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Hurrah for empirical bioethics (where hermeneutically clarified) or how perception of facts 'depends' on values. Schultz DS. Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec 11; 9(6-7):95-9. PubMed ID: 19998136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]