These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

175 related items for PubMed ID: 10856190

  • 1. A portable x-ray fluorescence instrument for analyzing dust wipe samples for lead: evaluation with field samples.
    Sterling DA, Lewis RD, Luke DA, Shadel BN.
    Environ Res; 2000 Jun; 83(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 10856190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Use of a field portable X-Ray fluorescence analyzer to determine the concentration of lead and other metals in soil samples.
    Clark S, Menrath W, Chen M, Roda S, Succop P.
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 1999 Jun; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10384212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Determination of the feasibility of using a portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer in the field for measurement of lead content of sieved soil.
    Markey AM, Clark CS, Succop PA, Roda S.
    J Environ Health; 2008 Mar; 70(7):24-9; quiz 55-6. PubMed ID: 18348388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of a portable X-ray fluorescence instrument for the determination of lead in workplace air samples.
    Morley JC, Clark CS, Deddens JA, Ashley K, Roda S.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 1999 May; 14(5):306-16. PubMed ID: 10446483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of methods and materials for the analysis of leaded wipes.
    Harper M, Hallmark TS, Bartolucci AA.
    J Environ Monit; 2002 Dec; 4(6):1025-33. PubMed ID: 12509061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Uncertainty determination for nondestructive chemical analytical methods using field data and application to XRF analysis for lead.
    Bartley DL, Slaven JE, Rose MC, Andrew ME, Harper M.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Dec; 4(12):931-42. PubMed ID: 17957563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Friction and impact surfaces: are they lead-based paint hazards?
    Dixon S, Wilson J, Galke W.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Nov; 4(11):855-63. PubMed ID: 17885913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Use of a Field Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer for Environmental Exposure Assessment of a Neighborhood in Cairo, Egypt Adjacent to the Site of a Former Secondary Lead Smelter.
    Menrath W, Zakaria Y, El-Safty A, Clark CS, Roda SM, Elsayed E, Lind C, Pesce J, Peng H.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015 Nov; 12(8):555-63. PubMed ID: 26131762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of soil pollution concentrations determined using AAS and portable XRF techniques.
    Radu T, Diamond D.
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Nov 15; 171(1-3):1168-71. PubMed ID: 19595504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Portable X-ray fluorescence instruments for the analysis of lead in paints.
    Kaplan EH, Lilley MD, Schaefer RF, Cade B, Desai A, Padva A, Orbach HG.
    Public Health Rep; 1975 Nov 15; 90(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 814571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Lead exposures from varnished floor refinishing.
    Schirmer J, Havlena J, Jacobs DE, Dixon S, Ikens R.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012 Nov 15; 9(4):280-7. PubMed ID: 22494405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of surface lead migration in pre-1950 homes: an on-site hand-held X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy study.
    Balasubramanian V, Spear TM, Hart JF, Larson JD.
    J Environ Health; 2011 Jun 15; 73(10):14-9. PubMed ID: 21667719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Performance evaluation of currently used portable X ray fluorescence instruments for measuring the lead content of paint in field samples.
    Muller Y, Favreau P, Kohler M.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014 Jun 15; 11(8):528-37. PubMed ID: 24964951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of a wipe and a vacuum collection method for the determination of lead in residential dusts.
    Farfel MR, Lees PS, Rohde CA, Lim BS, Bannon D, Chisolm JJ.
    Environ Res; 1994 May 15; 65(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 8187743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Portable XRF analysis of occupational air filter samples from different workplaces using different samplers: final results, summary and conclusions.
    Harper M, Pacolay B, Hintz P, Bartley DL, Slaven JE, Andrew ME.
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Nov 15; 9(11):1263-70. PubMed ID: 17968454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis for lead on air filters from different personal samplers used in a secondary lead smelter/solder manufacturer.
    Harper M, Pacolay B.
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan 15; 8(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 16395471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of portable XRF and ICP-OES analysis for lead on air filter samples from a lead ore concentrator mill and a lead-acid battery recycler.
    Harper M, Pacolay B, Hintz P, Andrew ME.
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Mar 15; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 16528423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The use of composite dust wipe samples as a means of assessing lead exposure.
    Friederich NJ, Bauer KM, Schultz BD, Holderman TS.
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999 Mar 15; 60(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 10386353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis for lead on air filters from different personal samplers used in a bronze foundry.
    Harper M, Pacolay B, Andrew ME.
    J Environ Monit; 2005 Jun 15; 7(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 15931420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Immediate and one-year post-intervention effectiveness of Maryland's lead law treatments.
    Breysse J, Anderson J, Dixon S, Galke W, Wilson J.
    Environ Res; 2007 Oct 15; 105(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 17559831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.