These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

151 related items for PubMed ID: 10858759

  • 1. The influence of oral bacteria on the surfaces of resin-based dental restorative materials--an in vitro study.
    Willershausen B, Callaway A, Ernst CP, Stender E.
    Int Dent J; 1999 Aug; 49(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 10858759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
    Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
    Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface.
    Nedeljkovic I, De Munck J, Ungureanu AA, Slomka V, Bartic C, Vananroye A, Clasen C, Teughels W, Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt KL.
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():36-43. PubMed ID: 28554609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S, Lorenzi R, Ferrieri P, Prati C.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of in vitro Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces naeslundii attachment and growth on restorative materials surfaces.
    Wei CX, Leung WK, Burrow MF.
    Aust Dent J; 2019 Dec; 64(4):365-375. PubMed ID: 31442307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Inhibition of bacterial and glucan adherence to various light-cured fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Kawai K, Takaoka T.
    J Dent; 2001 Feb; 29(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 11239586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material.
    Buergers R, Rosentritt M, Handel G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):461-9. PubMed ID: 18061740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Marginal adaptation to enamel of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo.
    van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P.
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Dec; 1(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9555215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Streptococcal adhesion to novel low-shrink silorane-based restorative.
    Buergers R, Schneider-Brachert W, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Handel G.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 18768217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Streptococcus mutans adhesion force sensing in multi-species oral biofilms.
    Wang C, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Ren Y.
    NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes; 2020 Jun 24; 6(1):25. PubMed ID: 32581220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Oral biofilm and caries-infiltrant interactions on enamel.
    Tawakoli PN, Attin T, Mohn D.
    J Dent; 2016 May 24; 48():40-5. PubMed ID: 26972979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bacterial viability on surface-modified resin-based dental restorative materials.
    Rüttermann S, Bergmann N, Beikler T, Raab WH, Janda R.
    Arch Oral Biol; 2012 Nov 24; 57(11):1512-21. PubMed ID: 22673754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite.
    van Dijken JW, Sjöström S.
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Dec 24; 2(4):180-3. PubMed ID: 10388391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
    Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar 24; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fluoride and mutans streptococci levels in plaque on aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, compomer and resin composite.
    van Dijken JW, Kalfas S, Litra V, Oliveby A.
    Caries Res; 1997 Mar 24; 31(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 9286522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W, Attin T, Hellwig E.
    J Clin Dent; 1996 Mar 24; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
    Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Uno S.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec 24; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Torii Y, Itota T, Okamoto M, Nakabo S, Nagamine M, Inoue K.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Dec 24; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.