These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

343 related items for PubMed ID: 10859905

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Flat-panel detectors in X-ray systems].
    Spahn M, Heer V, Freytag R.
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):340-50. PubMed ID: 12764582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A, Maggi F, Spalvieri S, Meduri A, Marano P.
    Rays; 2003 May; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Obstacles remain on road to digital mammography.
    Johnson M.
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D19-21. PubMed ID: 10724731
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
    Hemdal B, Andersson I, Grahn A, Håkansson M, Ruschin M, Thilander-Klang A, Båth M, Börjesson S, Medin J, Tingberg A, Månsson LG, Mattsson S.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Nov; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. For mammography, it's digital vs. screen-film.
    D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A.
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D16-8. PubMed ID: 10724730
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A, Hemdal B, Andersson I, Ruschin M, Thilander-Klang A, Börjesson S, Tingberg A, Mattsson S, Håkansson M, Båth M, Månsson LG, Medin J, Wanninger F, Panzer W.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Nov; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [New computed radiography technologies in digital radiography].
    Fasbender R, Schaetzing R.
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 12764585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Digital thorax radiography: flat-panel detector or storage phosphor plates].
    Schaefer-Prokop C, Uffmann M, Sailer J, Kabalan N, Herold C, Prokop M.
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):351-61. PubMed ID: 12764583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR, Kengyelics SM, Davies AG.
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K, Smeets P, De Hauwere A, Voet T, Duyck P, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Digital x-ray systems. Part 1. An introduction to DX technologies and an evaluation of cassette DX systems.
    Health Devices; 2001 Aug; 30(8):273-310. PubMed ID: 11544777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Examinations of rare-earth film-screen-systems for image detectors in mammography (author's transl)].
    Weberling R.
    Rontgenblatter; 1979 Mar; 32(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 432483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment].
    Rosselli Del Turco M, Milano F, Giani M, Bravetti P.
    Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Digital mammography.
    Feig SA, Yaffe MJ.
    Radiographics; 1998 Apr; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Digital x-ray: unwavering commitment collides with monumental challenges.
    Freiherr G.
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D4-7. PubMed ID: 10724732
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C, Ohara H.
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.