These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

646 related items for PubMed ID: 10865391

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H.
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Monteiro Júnior S, Ritter AV.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF, Piva E, Demarco FF, Correr Sobrinho L, Osinga PW.
    Oper Dent; 2006 Oct; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ, Connolly J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y, Shimada Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M, Friedrichs C.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Oct; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Märkl A.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Oct; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching dentin adhesive on marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M, Alavi M, Alavi S.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov 01; 8(7):54-61. PubMed ID: 17994155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. In vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of amalgam to tooth structure using two bonding agents--lutting glass ionomer and 4-META.
    Sheela K, Sudeep PT, Hegde V, Francis RF, Bhat KS.
    Indian J Dent Res; 1998 Nov 01; 9(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10530186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.