These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

232 related items for PubMed ID: 10870263

  • 1. [Determinants of the effectiveness of electric stimulation of the auditory nerve with cochlear implants: II. Configuration of the stimulating electrodes].
    Kral A, Hartmann R, Klinke R.
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000; 101(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 10870263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, Raggio MW, Leake PA.
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA, Faulkner KF, Tremblay KL.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Apr; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Topography of auditory nerve projections to the cochlear nucleus in cats after neonatal deafness and electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant.
    Leake PA, Hradek GT, Bonham BH, Snyder RL.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 9(3):349-72. PubMed ID: 18574634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.
    Garadat SN, Colesa DJ, Swiderski DL, Raphael Y, Pfingst BE.
    Hear Res; 2022 Feb; 414():108404. PubMed ID: 34883366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array.
    Jolly CN, Clopton BM, Spelman FA, Lineaweaver SK.
    Med Prog Technol; 1997 Feb; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
    Bierer JA, Faulkner KF.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.
    Snyder RL, Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 15492888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Multielectrode intracochlear implants. Nerve survival and stimulation patterns.
    Schindler RA, Merzenich MM, White MW, Bjorkroth B.
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1977 Dec; 103(12):691-9. PubMed ID: 588122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Synaptic plasticity after chemical deafening and electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats.
    Ryugo DK, Baker CA, Montey KL, Chang LY, Coco A, Fallon JB, Shepherd RK.
    J Comp Neurol; 2010 Apr 01; 518(7):1046-63. PubMed ID: 20127807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Design and fabrication of multichannel cochlear implants for animal research.
    Rebscher SJ, Hetherington AM, Snyder RL, Leake PA, Bonham BH.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct 15; 166(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17727956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.
    Snyder RL, Middlebrooks JC, Bonham BH.
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan 15; 235(1-2):23-38. PubMed ID: 18037252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Consequences of chronic extracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats.
    Leake PA, Snyder RL, Hradek GT, Rebscher SJ.
    Hear Res; 1995 Jan 15; 82(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 7744715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan 15; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in acutely deafened cats.
    George SS, Wise AK, Shivdasani MN, Shepherd RK, Fallon JB.
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Dec 15; 11(6):065003. PubMed ID: 25420148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Impulse patterns of auditory nerve fibres to extra- and intracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Hartmann R, Klinke R.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Dec 15; 469():128-34. PubMed ID: 2162619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Chronic Deafness Degrades Temporal Acuity in the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Pathway.
    Middlebrooks JC.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct 15; 19(5):541-557. PubMed ID: 29968099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Development of a novel eighth-nerve intraneural auditory neuroprosthesis.
    Badi AN, Kertesz TR, Gurgel RK, Shelton C, Normann RA.
    Laryngoscope; 2003 May 15; 113(5):833-42. PubMed ID: 12792319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in long-term deafened cats.
    George SS, Wise AK, Fallon JB, Shepherd RK.
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Jun 15; 12(3):036003. PubMed ID: 25834113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Intensity coding in electric hearing: effects of electrode configurations and stimulation waveforms.
    Chua TE, Bachman M, Zeng FG.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Jun 15; 32(6):679-89. PubMed ID: 21610498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.