These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

119 related items for PubMed ID: 10870757

  • 1. Proximal segment position after distraction with the MD-DOS device.
    Hendrickx K, Mommaerts MY, Jacobs W, Abeloos JV, Neyt LF, De Clercq CA.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 27(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 10870757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: which is better?
    Ow AT, Cheung LK.
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():55-7. PubMed ID: 19728632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
    Ricard D, Ferri J.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis by sagittal split osteotomy and intraoral curvilinear distraction.
    Schendel SA, Linck DW.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Jul; 15(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 15213543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Skeletal and dental stability of segmental distraction of the anterior mandibular alveolar process. A 2-year follow-up.
    Joss CU, Triaca A, Antonini M, Kiliaridis S, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):553-9. PubMed ID: 22356741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
    Baas EM, Pijpe J, de Lange J.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 22137334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Segmental distraction osteogenesis of the anterior alveolar process.
    Triaca A, Antonini M, Minoretti R, Merz BR.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jan; 59(1):26-34; discussion 34-5. PubMed ID: 11152187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Tooth-borne distraction of the lower anterior subapical segment for correction of class II malocclusion, subsequent to genioplasty.
    Matsushita K, Inoue N, Yamaguchi HO, Ooi K, Totsuka Y.
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 15(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 20635106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a randomized controlled trial comparing skeletal stability.
    Ow A, Cheung LK.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 19875317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement and its effect on relapse.
    Angle AD, Rebellato J, Sheats RD.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 17174764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.