These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

428 related items for PubMed ID: 10884215

  • 1. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures occurring at the tip of the stem: a biomechanical study of 5 techniques.
    Dennis MG, Simon JA, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, DiCesare PE.
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 10884215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A biomechanical study comparing cortical onlay allograft struts and plates in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.
    Wilson D, Frei H, Masri BA, Oxland TR, Duncan CP.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Jan; 20(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15567539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Tangential Bicortical Locked Fixation Improves Stability in Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.
    Lewis GS, Caroom CT, Wee H, Jurgensmeier D, Rothermel SD, Bramer MA, Reid JS.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2015 Oct; 29(10):e364-70. PubMed ID: 26053467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of fracture fixation constructs using a variable-angle locked periprosthetic femur plate system.
    Hoffmann MF, Burgers TA, Mason JJ, Williams BO, Sietsema DL, Jones CB.
    Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1035-41. PubMed ID: 24680467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cyclic loading of periprosthetic fracture fixation constructs.
    Talbot M, Zdero R, Schemitsch EH.
    J Trauma; 2008 May; 64(5):1308-12. PubMed ID: 18469655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of locking plate radial shaft fixation: unicortical locking fixation versus mixed bicortical and unicortical fixation in a sawbone model.
    Roberts JW, Grindel SI, Rebholz B, Wang M.
    J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Sep; 32(7):971-5. PubMed ID: 17826548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems: a biomechanical comparison of locked plating and conventional cable plates.
    Fulkerson E, Koval K, Preston CF, Iesaka K, Kummer FJ, Egol KA.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Feb; 20(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 16462560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Finite element analysis of different repair methods of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty.
    Chen DW, Lin CL, Hu CC, Wu JW, Lee MS.
    Injury; 2012 Jul; 43(7):1061-5. PubMed ID: 22336128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of two techniques.
    Dennis MG, Simon JA, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, Di Cesare PE.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2001 Jul; 15(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 11265007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation.
    Zdero R, Walker R, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1068-77. PubMed ID: 18451400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation: a biomechanical comparison between proximal locking screws and cables.
    Graham SM, Mak JH, Moazen M, Leonidou A, Jones AC, Wilcox RK, Tsiridis E.
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 Sep; 20(5):875-80. PubMed ID: 25968896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanical comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques.
    Fulkerson E, Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Liporace F, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ.
    J Trauma; 2006 Apr; 60(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16612304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur: comparison of titanium versus stainless steel and bicortical versus unicortical fixation.
    Beingessner D, Moon E, Barei D, Morshed S.
    J Trauma; 2011 Sep; 71(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 21610539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of bicortical versus unicortical screw placement of proximal tibia locking plates: a cadaveric model.
    Dougherty PJ, Kim DG, Meisterling S, Wybo C, Yeni Y.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jul; 22(6):399-403. PubMed ID: 18594304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with two different minimal invasive angle-stable plates: Biomechanical comparison studies on cadaveric bones.
    Konstantinidis L, Hauschild O, Beckmann NA, Hirschmüller A, Südkamp NP, Helwig P.
    Injury; 2010 Dec; 41(12):1256-61. PubMed ID: 21288467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
    O'Toole RV, Andersen RC, Vesnovsky O, Alexander M, Topoleski LD, Nascone JW, Sciadini MF, Turen C, Eglseder WA.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Dec; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.