These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

180 related items for PubMed ID: 10894635

  • 1. High throughput detection of retrovirus-associated reverse transcriptase using an improved fluorescent product enhanced reverse transcriptase assay and its comparison to conventional detection methods.
    Lovatt A, Black J, Galbraith D, Doherty I, Moran MW, Shepherd AJ, Griffen A, Bailey A, Wilson N, Smith KT.
    J Virol Methods; 1999 Oct; 82(2):185-200. PubMed ID: 10894635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A modified single-tube one-step product-enhanced reverse transcriptase (mSTOS-PERT) assay with heparin as DNA polymerase inhibitor for specific detection of RTase activity.
    Fan XY, Lü GZ, Wu LN, Chen JH, Xu WQ, Zhao CN, Guo SQ.
    J Clin Virol; 2006 Dec; 37(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 16971176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of different RT enzyme standards for quantitation of retroviruses using the single-tube fluorescent product-enhanced reverse transcriptase assay.
    Ma YK, Khan AS.
    J Virol Methods; 2009 May; 157(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 19186191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Specific suppression of false-positive signals in the product-enhanced reverse transcriptase assay.
    Lugert R, König H, Kurth R, Tönjes RR.
    Biotechniques; 1996 Feb; 20(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 8825150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Specific detection of RT activity in culture supernantants of retrovirus-producing cells, using synthetic DNA as competitor in polymerase enhanced reverse transcriptase assay.
    Voisset C, Tönjes RR, Breyton P, Mandrand B, Paranhos-Baccalà G.
    J Virol Methods; 2001 May; 94(1-2):187-93. PubMed ID: 11337053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Highly sensitive qualitative and quantitative detection of reverse transcriptase activity: optimization, validation, and comparative analysis with other detection systems.
    Yamamoto S, Folks TM, Heneine W.
    J Virol Methods; 1996 Sep; 61(1-2):135-43. PubMed ID: 8882946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Ultrasensitive retrovirus detection by a reverse transcriptase assay based on product enhancement.
    Pyra H, Böni J, Schüpbach J.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1994 Feb 15; 91(4):1544-8. PubMed ID: 7509077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. One-step fluorescent probe product-enhanced reverse transcriptase assay.
    Arnold BA, Hepler RW, Keller PM.
    Biotechniques; 1998 Jul 15; 25(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 9668983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Practical assay issues with the PERT/PBRT assay: a highly sensitive reverse transcriptase assay.
    Chang A, Dusing S.
    Dev Biol (Basel); 2006 Jul 15; 123():91-7; discussion 119-32. PubMed ID: 16566438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Use of a quantitative product-enhanced reverse transcriptase assay to monitor retrovirus levels in mAb cell-culture and downstream processing.
    Brorson K, Swann PG, Lizzio E, Maudru T, Peden K, Stein KE.
    Biotechnol Prog; 2001 Jul 15; 17(1):188-96. PubMed ID: 11170498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Single-tube fluorescent product-enhanced reverse transcriptase assay with Ampliwax (STF-PERT) for retrovirus quantitation.
    Sears JF, Khan AS.
    J Virol Methods; 2003 Mar 15; 108(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 12565165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A one-step SYBR Green I-based product-enhanced reverse transcriptase assay for the quantitation of retroviruses in cell culture supernatants.
    Pizzato M, Erlwein O, Bonsall D, Kaye S, Muir D, McClure MO.
    J Virol Methods; 2009 Mar 15; 156(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 19022294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Development of an improved product enhanced reverse transcriptase assay.
    Chang A, Ostrove JM, Bird RE.
    J Virol Methods; 1997 Apr 15; 65(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 9128861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The reverse transcriptase activity in cell-free medium of chicken embryo fibroblast cultures is not associated with a replication-competent retrovirus.
    Khan AS, Maudru T, Thompson A, Muller J, Sears JF, Peden KW.
    J Clin Virol; 1998 Jul 24; 11(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 9784139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Detection and isolation of type C retrovirus particles from fresh and cultured lymphocytes of a patient with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
    Poiesz BJ, Ruscetti FW, Gazdar AF, Bunn PA, Minna JD, Gallo RC.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1980 Dec 24; 77(12):7415-9. PubMed ID: 6261256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Porcine retrovirus: optimal conditions for its biochemical detection.
    Phan-Thanh L, Kaeffer B, Bottreau E.
    Arch Virol; 1992 Dec 24; 123(3-4):255-65. PubMed ID: 1373281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. On the early emergence of reverse transcription: theoretical basis and experimental evidence.
    Lazcano A, Valverde V, Hernández G, Gariglio P, Fox GE, Oró J.
    J Mol Evol; 1992 Dec 24; 35(6):524-36. PubMed ID: 1282161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Improved Mg2+-based reverse transcriptase assay for detection of primate retroviruses.
    Sears JF, Repaske R, Khan AS.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun 24; 37(6):1704-8. PubMed ID: 10325311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Quantitative detection of RT activity by PERT assay: feasibility and limits to a standardized screening assay for human vaccines.
    André M, Morgeaux S, Fuchs F.
    Biologicals; 2000 Jun 24; 28(2):67-80. PubMed ID: 10885614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.