These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

182 related items for PubMed ID: 10895630

  • 1. Validation of spiral computed tomography for dental implants.
    Cavalcanti MG, Yang J, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):329-33. PubMed ID: 10895630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. 3D volume rendering using multislice CT for dental implants.
    Cavalcanti MG, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 12087438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accurate linear measurements in the anterior maxilla using orthoradially reformatted spiral computed tomography.
    Cavalcanti MG, Yang J, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 10740466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. 2-D and 3-D reconstructions of spiral computed tomography in localization of the inferior alveolar canal for dental implants.
    Yang J, Cavalcanti MG, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Mar; 87(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 10102603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999 Mar; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
    Hanazawa T, Sano T, Seki K, Okano T.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Quantitative analysis of spiral computed tomography for craniofacial clinical applications.
    Cavalcanti MG, Vannier MW.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 10895633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery.
    Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Verstreken K, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 10522199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Three-dimensional computed tomography landmark measurement in craniofacial surgical planning: experimental validation in vitro.
    Cavalcanti MG, Haller JW, Vannier MW.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Jun; 57(6):690-4. PubMed ID: 10368094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Relationship between the position of the mental foramen and the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve as determined by cone beam computed tomography combined with mimics.
    Chen Z, Chen D, Tang L, Wang F.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015 Jun; 39(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 25299797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In vivo, thyroid and lens surface exposure with spiral and conventional computed tomography in dental implant radiography.
    Bianchi J, Goggins W, Rudolph M.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Aug; 90(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 10936846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy of computerized tomography for the evaluation of mandibular sites prior to implant placement.
    Sforza NM, Franchini F, Lamma A, Botticelli S, Ghigi G.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Dec; 27(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 18092453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography.
    Besimo CE, Lambrecht JT, Guindy JS.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10654036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant assessment.
    Benson BW.
    Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 8633304
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Subjective image quality assessment of cross sectional imaging methods for the symphyseal region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement.
    Shelley AM, Brunton P, Horner K.
    J Dent; 2011 Nov; 39(11):764-70. PubMed ID: 21875641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Changes in the pre-surgical treatment planning using conventional spiral tomography.
    Diniz AF, Mendonça EF, Leles CR, Guilherme AS, Cavalcante MP, Silva MA.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 18237315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Computed tomography for dental implants: the influence of the gantry angle and mandibular positioning on the bone height and width.
    Dantas JA, Montebello Filho A, Campos PS.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jan; 34(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15709099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Perioperative validation of localisation of the mental foramen.
    Bou Serhal C, Jacobs R, Flygare L, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 11803387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA.
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effective uses of radiographs for implant placements--panographs, cephalograms, CT scans.
    Kraut RA.
    Dent Implantol Update; 1993 Apr; 4(4):29-33. PubMed ID: 8298153
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.