These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
416 related items for PubMed ID: 10905398
21. [Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and efferent control of cochlea]. Xu J, Liu C, Guo L, Lian N, Liu B. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 12761959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Detection of pseudohypacusis: a prospective, randomized study of the use of otoacoustic emissions. Balatsouras DG, Kaberos A, Korres S, Kandiloros D, Ferekidis E, Economou C. Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):518-827. PubMed ID: 14663351 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Low-frequency otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren measured by two commercial devices. Jedrzejczak WW, Piotrowska A, Kochanek K, Sliwa L, Skarzynski H. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 77(10):1724-8. PubMed ID: 23972827 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in young children with otitis media with effusion before and after surgery. Dragicević D, Vlaski L, Komazec Z, Jović RM. Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Jun; 37(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 19864093 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR. Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Clinical use of transitory otoacoustic evoked emissions in therapeutic follow-up]. Hoth S, Bönnhoff S. HNO; 1993 Mar; 41(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 7682543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease. Stuart A, Preast JL. Ear Hear; 2012 Mar; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of age on speech recognition in noise and on contralateral transient evoked otoacoustic emission suppression. Yilmaz ST, Sennaroğlu G, Sennaroğlu L, Köse SK. J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Nov; 121(11):1029-34. PubMed ID: 17381896 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Sensitive detection of noise-induced damage in human subjects using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Xu ZM, Van Cauwenberge P, Vinck B, De Vel E. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1998 Nov; 52(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 9581192 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Distortion product emission latency in normal hearing adults. Marques Vde V, Azevedo MF. Pro Fono; 2004 Nov; 16(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 15311745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital subtraction method for transient evoked otoacoustic emission recording with ipsilateral noise suppression: an application to stimulus artifact reduction. Arslan RB, Ozdamar O, Ulgen Y. Audiology; 2001 Nov; 40(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 11409763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]