These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

322 related items for PubMed ID: 10905450

  • 1. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore 'normal' loudness for speech at different levels.
    Moore BC.
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 34(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 10905450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC, Glasberg BR, Stone MA.
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):241-58. PubMed ID: 10509859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC, Alcántara JI, Stone MA, Glasberg BR.
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 33(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 10439142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.
    Moore BC, Alcántara JI, Marriage J.
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 35(6):339-53. PubMed ID: 11848176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Restoring Perceived Loudness for Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Oetting D, Hohmann V, Appell JE, Kollmeier B, Ewert SD.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Dec; 39(4):664-678. PubMed ID: 29210810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE, Dillon H.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Dec; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids.
    Stone MA, Moore BC, Alcántara JI, Glasberg BR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3603-19. PubMed ID: 10615700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG, Dalzell S, Peterson D, Kopun J, Lewis DL, Hoover BE.
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY, Quar TK, Johnson EE, Newall P, Sharma M.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Control of hearing-aid saturated sound pressure level by frequency-shaped output compression limiting.
    McDermott HJ, Dean MR, Dillon H.
    Scand Audiol; 1999 Mar; 28(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 10207954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.