These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

293 related items for PubMed ID: 10911785

  • 21. Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice.
    Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Cutter GR.
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):830-4. PubMed ID: 12033579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial.
    Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Averbukh A, Moran C, Berns EA, Yaffe MJ, Herman B, Acharyya S, Gatsonis C.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 20093597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Investigation of Exposure Factors for Various Breast Composition and Thicknesses in Digital Screening Mammography Related to Breast Dose.
    Alkhalifah K, Brindhaban A.
    Med Princ Pract; 2018 Feb; 27(3):211-216. PubMed ID: 29514152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.
    Boone JM, Nelson TR, Lindfors KK, Seibert JA.
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):657-67. PubMed ID: 11719660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Visibility of microcalcification in cone beam breast CT: effects of X-ray tube voltage and radiation dose.
    Lai CJ, Shaw CC, Chen L, Altunbas MC, Liu X, Han T, Wang T, Yang WT, Whitman GJ, Tu SJ.
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2995-3004. PubMed ID: 17822008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography.
    Young KC, Oduko JM, Bosmans H, Nijs K, Martinez L.
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79(948):981-90. PubMed ID: 17213303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A survey on performance status of mammography machines: image quality and dosimetry studies using a standard mammography imaging phantom.
    Sharma R, Sharma SD, Mayya YS.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 22090414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Mammography Dose Survey Using International Quality Standards.
    Boujemaa S, Bosmans H, Bentayeb F.
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Dec; 50(4):529-535. PubMed ID: 31420271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.
    de Groot JE, Broeders MJ, Branderhorst W, den Heeten GJ, Grimbergen CA.
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081901. PubMed ID: 23927315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
    Siegel MJ, Schmidt B, Bradley D, Suess C, Hildebolt C.
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Getting started with protocol for quality assurance of digital mammography in the clinical centre of Montenegro.
    Ivanovic S, Bosmans H, Mijovic S.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):363-8. PubMed ID: 25862535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Helvie MA, Chan HP, Adler DD, Boyd PG.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.