These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

160 related items for PubMed ID: 10912969

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS, Robischon K, Cox C.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
    Aviram A, Yogev Y, Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Danon D, Hadar E, Gabbay-Benziv R.
    J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
    Ashrafunnessa, Jehan AH, Chowdhury SB, Sultana F, Haque JA, Khatun S, Karim MA.
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Finding the most accurate method to measure head circumference for fetal weight estimation.
    Schmidt U, Temerinac D, Bildstein K, Tuschy B, Mayer J, Sütterlin M, Siemer J, Kehl S.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():153-6. PubMed ID: 24802187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Ultrasonic prediction of term birth weight in Hispanic women. Accuracy in an outpatient clinic.
    Nahum GG, Pham KQ, McHugh JP.
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jan; 48(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 12611089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intrapartum fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio: an ultrasonographic clue to fetal macrosomia.
    Santolaya-Forgas J, Meyer WJ, Gauthier DW, Kahn D.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1072-5. PubMed ID: 7943073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Automated Fractional Limb Volume Measurements Improve the Precision of Birth Weight Predictions in Late Third-Trimester Fetuses.
    Mack LM, Kim SY, Lee S, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Lee W.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Aug; 36(8):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 28439966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fetal weight estimation formulas with head, abdominal, femur, and thigh circumference measurements.
    Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Rodis JF, Bors-Koefoed R, Nochimson DJ.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 157(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 3618691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.