These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

139 related items for PubMed ID: 10931257

  • 1. Comparison of the transfer precision of three different impression materials in combination with transfer caps for the Frialit-2 system.
    Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Penkner K, Polansky R, Sedaj B, Wegscheider WA.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Jul; 27(7):629-38. PubMed ID: 10931257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ, Owen P, Howes DG.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC, Akça K.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K, Cehreli MC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Aug; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants.
    Reddy S, Prasad K, Vakil H, Jain A, Chowdhary R.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2013 Feb; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Lin WS, Harris BT, Elathamna EN, Abdel-Azim T, Morton D.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015 Feb; 30(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 25615919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA, Chávez AM, Amaral AL, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Feb; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.