These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

78 related items for PubMed ID: 10934954

  • 1. Reproducibility in double scanning of cervical smears with the PAPNET system.
    Doornewaard H, van der Schouw YT, van der Graaf Y.
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):604-10. PubMed ID: 10934954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
    Weissbrod D, Torres M, Rodríguez A, Ureña I, Estrada J, Reyes ME, Carreto AJ.
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [An interlaboratory study of the use of PapNet in the quality control of cervico-vaginal cytology].
    Cosentino A, Ghidoni D, Salemi M, Folicaldi S, Amadori A, Zani J, Grasso G, Bondi A.
    Pathologica; 1999 Apr; 91(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 10484869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. PAPNET computer-aided rescreening for detection of benign and malignant glandular elements in cervicovaginal smears: a review of 61 cases.
    Sturgis CD, Isoe C, McNeal NE, Yu GH, DeFrias DV.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Apr; 18(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 9557269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Consistency of a double PAPNET scan of cervical smears.
    Jenny J, Isenegger I, Boon ME, Husain OA.
    Acta Cytol; 1997 Apr; 41(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 9022731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The PAPNET system for quality control of cervical smears: validation and limits.
    Cenci M, Nagar C, Giovagnoli MR, Vecchione A.
    Anticancer Res; 1997 Apr; 17(6D):4731-4. PubMed ID: 9494597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Differences between false-negative and true-positive Papanicolaou smears on Papnet-assisted review.
    Mitchell H, Medley G.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Aug; 19(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 9702494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
    Sherman ME, Schiffman M, Herrero R, Kelly D, Bratti C, Mango LJ, Alfaro M, Hutchinson ML, Mena F, Hildesheim A, Morales J, Greenberg MD, Balmaceda I, Lorincz AT.
    Cancer; 1998 Oct 25; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Simulation of primary cervical cancer screening by the PAPNET system in an unscreened, high-risk community.
    Michelow PM, Hlongwane NF, Leiman G.
    Acta Cytol; 1997 Oct 25; 41(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 9022732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Quality control of cervical cytology in high-risk women. PAPNET system compared with manual rescreening.
    Bergeron C, Masseroli M, Ghezi A, Lemarie A, Mango L, Koss LG.
    Acta Cytol; 2000 Oct 25; 44(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 10740599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of Papnet-assisted and manual screening of cervical smears.
    Losell K, Dejmek A.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Oct 25; 21(4):296-9. PubMed ID: 10495327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Detection of endocervical component by PAPNET system on negative cervical smears.
    Ashfaq R, Solares B, Saboorian MH.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Aug 25; 15(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 8872433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.