These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

925 related items for PubMed ID: 1094929

  • 21. Singly and doubly contingent after-effects involving color, orientation and spatial frequency.
    Wyatt HJ.
    Vision Res; 1974 Nov; 14(11):1185-93. PubMed ID: 4428625
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Letter: Is spatial masking selective to wavelength?
    Over R, Wenderoth P.
    Vision Res; 1974 Jan; 14(1):157-8. PubMed ID: 4812916
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The anti-McCollough effect: the mystery remains.
    Sheth BR.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2203-4. PubMed ID: 21789694
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Are long-term changes to perception explained by Pavlovian associations or perceptual learning theory?
    Bedford FL.
    Cognition; 1997 Aug; 64(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 9385872
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. A discussion of G. H. Fisher's 'towards a new explanation for the geometrical illusions: apparent depth or contour proximity?' and the inappropriate constancy-scaling theory.
    Gregory RL.
    Br J Psychol; 1973 Nov; 64(4):623-6. PubMed ID: 4757897
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. VISUAL NOISE AS A TOOL OF RESEARCH.
    MACKAY DM.
    J Gen Psychol; 1965 Apr; 72():181-97. PubMed ID: 14285614
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Grating induction: a new type of aftereffect.
    Tyler CW, Nakayama K.
    Vision Res; 1980 Apr; 20(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 7414978
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Interference with McCollough effects via pre- and postinduction exposure to achromatic gratings: time course and magnitude of aftereffect decrement.
    Skowbo D.
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Oct; 44(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 3226875
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Emmert's law in the Ames room.
    Dwyer J, Ashton R, Broerse J.
    Perception; 1990 Oct; 19(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 2336333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Direction of a figural retroactive-effect as a function of apparent temporal overlap of test and inducing figures.
    Adam J, Heron R, Cooper D, Hepner A.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 4815524
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Motion-aftereffect-induced blindness.
    Lages M, Adams WJ, Graf EW.
    J Vis; 2009 Oct 13; 9(11):11.1-7. PubMed ID: 20053074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Feature analysers, optical illusions, and figural aftereffects.
    Oyama T.
    Perception; 1977 Oct 13; 6(4):401-6. PubMed ID: 917729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Perception and representation.
    Kolers PA.
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1983 Oct 13; 34():129-66. PubMed ID: 6187276
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Bigness is in the eye of the beholder.
    Roscoe SN.
    Hum Factors; 1985 Dec 13; 27(6):615-36. PubMed ID: 3914446
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 47.