These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

91 related items for PubMed ID: 10949836

  • 1. Analysis of the morphology of oral structures from 3-D co-ordinate data.
    Jovanovski V, Lynch E.
    Monogr Oral Sci; 2000; 17():73-129. PubMed ID: 10949836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Binary morphological shape-based interpolation applied to 3-D tooth reconstruction.
    Borş AG, Kechagias L, Pitas I.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Feb; 21(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 11929098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Development and evaluation of a new 3-D digitization and computer graphic system to study the anatomic tissue and restoration surfaces.
    Dastane A, Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J, Mehra R, Hesby R.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 8850158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses.
    Bratos M, Bergin JM, Rubenstein JE, Sorensen JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 29559220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The evidence supporting methods of tooth width measurement: Part II. Digital models and intra-oral scanners.
    Naidu D, Freer TJ.
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 Nov; 29(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 24380136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Three-dimensional computer-assisted study model analysis of long-term oral-appliance wear. Part 1: Methodology.
    Chen H, Lowe AA, de Almeida FR, Wong M, Fleetham JA, Wang B.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):393-407. PubMed ID: 18774086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Analysing the variations of shapes based on surface-models.
    Däuber S, Heinze P, Kübler C, Wörn H.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002 Sep; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 1():267-9. PubMed ID: 12451835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy of a three-dimensional dentition model digitized from an interocclusal record using a non-contact surface scanner.
    Kihara T, Yoshimi Y, Taji T, Murayama T, Tanimoto K, Nikawa H.
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 26378085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A new method to measure mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth with volumetric cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Tong H, Enciso R, Van Elslande D, Major PW, Sameshima GT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 22748999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of reducing acquisition time on single-photon emission computed tomography image quality using proprietary resolution recovery software.
    Aldridge MD, Waddington WW, Dickson JC, Prakash V, Ell PJ, Bomanji JB.
    Nucl Med Commun; 2013 Nov; 34(11):1116-23. PubMed ID: 24056385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Registration accuracy in the integration of laser-scanned dental images into maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Noh H, Nabha W, Cho JH, Hwang HS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 21967948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Construction of database for three-dimensional human tooth models and its ability for education and research--Carious tooth models -.
    Nagasawa S, Yoshida T, Tamura K, Yamazoe M, Hayano K, Arai Y, Yamada H, Kasahara E, Ito M.
    Dent Mater J; 2010 Mar; 29(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 20379022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Three-dimensional dental model constructed from an average dental form.
    Nam SE, Kim YH, Park YS, Baek SH, Hayashi K, Kim KN, Lee SP.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 22284289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of four different optimized magnetic-resonance-imaging sequences for visualization of dental and maxillo-mandibular structures at 3 T.
    Assaf AT, Zrnc TA, Remus CC, Schönfeld M, Habermann CR, Riecke B, Friedrich RE, Fiehler J, Heiland M, Sedlacik J.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1356-63. PubMed ID: 24837485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Synetic superimposition of dental 3D data: application in twin studies.
    Smith RN, Townsend G, Chen K, Brook A.
    Front Oral Biol; 2009 Oct; 13():142-147. PubMed ID: 19828986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A three-dimensional setup model with dental roots.
    Guo H, Zhou J, Bai Y, Li S.
    J Clin Orthod; 2011 Apr; 45(4):209-16; quiz 235-6. PubMed ID: 21785205
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. An orthognathic simulation system integrating teeth, jaw and face data using 3D cephalometry.
    Noguchi N, Tsuji M, Shigematsu M, Goto M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):640-5. PubMed ID: 17368000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy.
    Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI.
    J Orthod; 2008 Sep; 35(3):191-201; discussion 175. PubMed ID: 18809782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Three-dimensional myocardial strain reconstruction from tagged MRI using a cylindrical B-spline model.
    Deng X, Denney TS.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):861-7. PubMed ID: 15250638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Interpolation of 3-D binary images based on morphological skeletonization.
    Chatzis V, Pitas I.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Jul; 19(7):699-710. PubMed ID: 11055785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.