These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
97 related items for PubMed ID: 10958912
1. Independent mechanisms produce visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and perceived visual pitch (PVP). Hudson TE, Li W, Matin L. Vision Res; 2000; 40(19):2605-19. PubMed ID: 10958912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Neural model for processing the influence of visual orientation on visually perceived eye level (VPEL). Matin L, Li W. Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(22):2845-72. PubMed ID: 11701180 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity. Matin L, Fox CR. Vision Res; 1989 Oct; 29(3):315-24. PubMed ID: 2773342 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Change in visually perceived eye level without change in perceived pitch. Li W, Matin L. Perception; 1998 Oct; 27(5):553-72. PubMed ID: 10070555 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mislocalizations of visual elevation and visual vertical induced by visual pitch: the great circle model. Matin L, Li W. Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1992 May 22; 656():242-65. PubMed ID: 1599147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodal basis for egocentric spatial localization and orientation. Matin L, Li W. J Vestib Res; 1995 May 22; 5(6):499-518. PubMed ID: 8589859 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Visually perceived eye level with reversible pitch stimuli: implications for the great circle and implicit surface models. Post BR, Teague JM, Welch RB, Hudson TE. Perception; 2003 May 22; 32(9):1073-92. PubMed ID: 14651321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Averaging and summation of influences on visually perceived eye level between two long lines differing in pitch or roll-tilt. Matin L, Li W. Vision Res; 1999 Jan 22; 39(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 10326138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined influences of gravitoinertial force level and visual field pitch on visually perceived eye level. DiZio P, Li W, Lackner JR, Matin L. J Vestib Res; 1997 Jan 22; 7(5):381-92. PubMed ID: 9376912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in influence between pitched-from-vertical lines and slanted-from-frontal horizontal lines on egocentric localization. Li W, Matin L. Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jan 22; 57(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 7885809 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Why do pitched horizontal lines have such a small effect on visually perceived eye level? Post RB, Welch RB, Clark VD. Percept Psychophys; 2000 May 22; 62(4):726-34. PubMed ID: 10883581 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Linear combinations of signals from two lines of the same or different orientations. Matin L, Li W. Vision Res; 2000 May 22; 40(5):517-27. PubMed ID: 10820610 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Visually perceived eye level: changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field. Matin L, Li WX. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Feb 22; 18(1):257-89. PubMed ID: 1532191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Individual differences in perceived elevation and verticality: evidence of a common visual process. Shavit AY, Li W, Matin L. Multisens Res; 2013 Feb 22; 26(3):205-39. PubMed ID: 23964476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial summation among coextensive and parallel line segments across wide separations (50 degrees): egocentric localization and the great circle model. Matin L, Li W. Vision Res; 1994 Oct 22; 34(19):2577-98. PubMed ID: 7975297 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]