These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


326 related items for PubMed ID: 10960751

  • 1. Penetration of radiocalcium at the margins of resin and glass ionomer dentine bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth.
    Tulunoglu O, Tulunoglu I, Ulusu T, Genç Y.
    J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):481-6. PubMed ID: 10960751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O, Uçtaşh M, Alaçam A, Omürlü H.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Sep; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems.
    Yap AU, Ho KS, Wong KM.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Sep; 25(9):666-71. PubMed ID: 9758395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC, Canoğlu E, Cehreli ZC.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014 May; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Microleakage of Compoglass-F and Dyract-AP compomers in Class V preparations after salivary contamination.
    Evancusky JW, Meiers JC.
    Pediatr Dent; 2000 May; 22(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 10730285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S.
    Oper Dent; 2011 May; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD, Swift EJ, May KN, Thompson JY, McDougal RA.
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin.
    Burrow MF, Nopnakeepong U, Phrukkanon S.
    Dent Mater; 2002 May; 18(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 11823016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA, Mortier E, Droz D.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008 May; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.