These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns. Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H, Cehreli MC. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of fatigue damage on the force required to remove a restoration in a cement-retained implant system. Kaar D, Oshida Y, Andres CJ, Barco MT, Platt JA. J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 16958729 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, Tietge JD. J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):737-41. PubMed ID: 1432793 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of luting agents on the retention of dental implant-supported crowns. Pan YH, Lin CK. Chang Gung Med J; 2005 Jun; 28(6):403-10. PubMed ID: 16124156 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns. Lewinstein I, Block L, Lehr Z, Ormianer Z, Matalon S. J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study. Santosa RE, Martin W, Morton D. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Dec; 25(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21197491 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]