These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
596 related items for PubMed ID: 10966251
1. Scoring systems in cancer patients admitted for an acute complication in a medical intensive care unit. Sculier JP, Paesmans M, Markiewicz E, Berghmans T. Crit Care Med; 2000 Aug; 28(8):2786-92. PubMed ID: 10966251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three severity scores for critically ill cancer patients. Schellongowski P, Benesch M, Lang T, Traunmüller F, Zauner C, Laczika K, Locker GJ, Frass M, Staudinger T. Intensive Care Med; 2004 Mar; 30(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 14598029 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Verification of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit. Oh TE, Hutchinson R, Short S, Buckley T, Lin E, Leung D. Crit Care Med; 1993 May; 21(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 8482091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Is a specific oncological scoring system better at predicting the prognosis of cancer patients admitted for an acute medical complication in an intensive care unit than general gravity scores? Berghmans T, Paesmans M, Sculier JP. Support Care Cancer; 2004 Apr; 12(4):234-9. PubMed ID: 14740281 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: results of a multicenter, multinational study. The European/North American Severity Study Group. Castella X, Artigas A, Bion J, Kari A. Crit Care Med; 1995 Aug; 23(8):1327-35. PubMed ID: 7634802 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of three prognostic models in patients with cancer in need of intensive care in a medical center in China. Xing X, Gao Y, Wang H, Huang C, Qu S, Zhang H, Wang H, Sun K. PLoS One; 2015 Aug; 10(6):e0131329. PubMed ID: 26110534 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of severity scoring systems SAPS II and APACHE II in a single-center population. Capuzzo M, Valpondi V, Sgarbi A, Bortolazzi S, Pavoni V, Gilli G, Candini G, Gritti G, Alvisi R. Intensive Care Med; 2000 Dec; 26(12):1779-85. PubMed ID: 11271085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scoring systems and outcome of chronic kidney disease patients admitted in intensive care units. Goswami J, Balwani MR, Kute V, Gumber M, Patel M, Godhani U. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2018 Dec; 29(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 29657198 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) scoring systems in a single Greek intensive care unit. Katsaragakis S, Papadimitropoulos K, Antonakis P, Strergiopoulos S, Konstadoulakis MM, Androulakis G. Crit Care Med; 2000 Feb; 28(2):426-32. PubMed ID: 10708178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II in predicting hospital mortality of neurosurgical intensive care unit patients. Park SK, Chun HJ, Kim DW, Im TH, Hong HJ, Yi HJ. J Korean Med Sci; 2009 Jun; 24(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 19543503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after pneumonectomy. Keegan MT, Harrison BA, Brown DR, Whalen FX, Cassivi SD, Afessa B. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Dec; 21(6):832-7. PubMed ID: 18068061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]