These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

327 related items for PubMed ID: 11005902

  • 1. Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations.
    Yaman SD, Yetmez M, Türköz E, Akkas N.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 11005902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of grooves on resistance/retention form of Class 2 approximal slot amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB, Osborne JW, Burgess JO.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Sep; 18(5):209-13. PubMed ID: 8152991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of grooves on resistance form of Class 2 amalgams with wide occlusal preparations.
    Summitt JB, Osborne JW, Burgess JO, Howell ML.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Sep; 18(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 8337180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Gomide HA, Araujo CA, Martins LR, Soares CJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR, Soares CJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
    Görücü J, Ozgünaltay G.
    Oper Dent; 2003 Jan; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of amalgam bonding on resistance form of Class II amalgam restorations.
    Della Bona A, Summitt JB.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 9643242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of grooves on resistance form of conservative Class 2 amalgams.
    Summitt JB, Howell ML, Burgess JO, Dutton FB, Osborne JW.
    Oper Dent; 1992 Feb; 17(2):50-6. PubMed ID: 1437687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fracture strength of Class I versus Class II restored premolars tested at the marginal ridge. I. Standard preparations.
    Purk JH, Eick JD, DeSchepper EJ, Chappell RP, Tira DE.
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Jul; 21(7):545-51. PubMed ID: 2094853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Jul; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ, Cawte SG, Wilson NH.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Jul; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Debonding of adhesively restored deep Class II MOD restorations after functional loading.
    Ausiello P, Davidson CL, Cascone P, DeGee AJ, Rengo S.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Apr; 12(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 10477988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
    Siso SH, Hürmüzlü F, Turgut M, Altundaşar E, Serper A, Er K.
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Mar; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, Roeters JJ, Burgersdijk RC.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Effects of different class II cavity designs on stresses in restoration].
    Xu X, Sun Z, Tao L, Xiong H.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):446-8. PubMed ID: 12641960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G, Buono L, Grande NM, Lamorgese V, Somma F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV, Wilson NH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.